From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DD4FC35274 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:11:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=67Tm/jNjTepxUnx/8bL4qmLd8P+X4jLTJVZTl3DYdys=; b=VkHkwa8EtXfnyt +b6kRfTSIhM3x64hIW9/hgLkzjkduHFMtsSMzmEOsIeoeoxuDJHAbS63+JjLX7y5q8nuTCsRUJjHI X+Np1Tt4OZWIoUmXqk38n/cobyrpP4BTj5QQBmJ4lc8Vzpf6UEfKOrNy7ibzu8t6051nHCDD+Qnh+ FtdlPxopeIqIvzpQioXF/WC9pja4HYlsPj83nLxg9fwEyMimPlswWwXCSBC2s/BW6YATg8KKmPeBH z1yl5NYC3jV5G2G1qBr9v2wTzFt48jzYLV6cf66+8aBoKU8k73Qu4ItHJnYBOFU3Ra6OcPi4umf7N d9rcqzzAFhyNDp2GPpqQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rGF5F-002CRV-1F; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:11:13 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rGF5C-002CPj-0r for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:11:11 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDCDB81F9A; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07B60C433C8; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:11:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1703149867; bh=/WzNv9MnpdH5DL+RbcHgW/lhQEnlhmwuWZbe7H2FjoI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Zbt+M9FvnqygUuM7jlyguqNlW2VmMiyfgcxqdiEa3FDBXrccfvI55WRXCFP5zcIrl jWL/AidAA8QFWGEt6e6VJyeOh0sQv36uLT2RzJQCClFYma8Dl/19W5HYdmNAQLC4p8 b/dZVANnIoJp+s3NmVmALYa6SKFkzZBaTHMVBI3A= Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 10:11:04 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "Gan, Yi Fang" Cc: Andrew Halaney , Javier Martinez Canillas , John Stultz , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Jens Axboe , Russell King , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beh=FAn?= , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Looi Hong Aun , Voon Weifeng , Song Yoong Siang , Lai Peter Jun Ann , Choong Yong Liang Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] Fix phylink unloadable issue Message-ID: <2023122141-smuggling-confidant-d1d8@gregkh> References: <20231221085109.2830794-1-yi.fang.gan@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231221085109.2830794-1-yi.fang.gan@intel.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231221_011110_478541_A851B886 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.80 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 04:51:07PM +0800, Gan, Yi Fang wrote: > Add module_exit_stub() for phylink module. > > Changes since v1: > - Introduce a helper macro for module_exit() boilerplate > > This series is the combination of following: > v1 with empty phylink_exit(): > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231127101603.807593-1-yi.fang.gan@intel.com/ > v1 of module_exit_stub(): > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231212094352.2263283-1-yi.fang.gan@intel.com/ As I said before, no, this isn't ok. Why just resubmit a patch when it's already been rejected? This patch series should NOT be accepted as-is, you know this! Also, you are not following the documented and REQUIRED rules for Intel developers to be submitting kernel patches, so on that reason alone these need to be rejected. Please work with the Intel internel developers to do this correctly if you wish to submit this again in the future. greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel