Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: atmel,hlcdc: convert pwm bindings to json-schema

From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Dharma.B@microchip.com
Cc: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux4Microchip@microchip.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Conor.Dooley@microchip.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev,
	airlied@gmail.com, sam@ravnborg.org, lee@kernel.org,
	u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	bbrezillon@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: atmel,hlcdc: convert pwm bindings to json-schema
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 15:33:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240117-headlock-edge-56ddb1b273d2@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6124f244-23bc-4b84-b678-f7214cf8c48e@microchip.com>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2333 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 02:43:00AM +0000, Dharma.B@microchip.com wrote:
> On 17/01/24 1:40 am, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> > 
> > On 16/01/2024 18:03:19+0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 05:07:59PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
> >>> Convert device tree bindings for Atmel's HLCDC PWM controller to YAML
> >>> format.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@microchip.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> changelog
> >>> v1 -> v2
> >>> - Remove the explicit copyrights.
> >>> - Modify title (not include words like binding/driver).
> >>> - Modify description actually describing the hardware and not the driver.
> >>> - Remove pinctrl properties which aren't required.
> >>> - Drop parent node and it's other sub-device node which are not related here.
> >>> ---
> >>>   .../bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml         | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>>   .../bindings/pwm/atmel-hlcdc-pwm.txt          | 29 ------------
> >>>   2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml
> >>>   delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel-hlcdc-pwm.txt
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 000000000000..751122309fa9
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >>
> >> The original file has no license, but was originally written by a
> >> free-electrons employee, so the relicensing here is fine.
> >>
> > 
> > I confirm relicensing is fine, even assigning the copyright to
> > Microchip (note that Bootlin is legally the same entity as
> > free-electrons)
> Thanks Conor and Alexandre.
> I will add the copyrights back in v3.

Just to note, in case you misunderstood my original comment here:
What I said had nothing to do with adding a Microchip copyright assignment
to the file, but rather about the fact that your patch relicenses the
binding from GPL v2 to GPL v2 OR BSD 2 Clause.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel