From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E672C47DB3 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 02:09:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=OBjTWHLzmaFSbsDCXLkqaFbKzWBqjxnuB2v4TESgFy0=; b=Us71vVYt7fVVQE LtRmEFHs3mbxGj6T6ZOd/SQQ7FRmdHDldv6rV6foLZwjhkHRZF7gmKsXJXCmQrTk8dMCKMPcAyk2Y qYP3YZoaHZQDkHW5f52iowmnWkOinBVrukmVQNAtyTWtxgl5XBUIWSkevZ1yzygiDsoPAaQEimPqi 6+0fkOocwlKEluKAYESp8d2Njn5048CFpCr4WC4vazwFU5eLenkUhk2NZSJl4iy6fo1IhIAfOO7Ak CwWH+RpjzuGorTKBhssuD/GwZIRaEAZkjPI0fT6zXAVDtNGF/GITd1lzuDtmGBjthiv0N9dtpeVWg nHFBhKmY5oNyt+7dkLnw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rUdYR-0000000EugB-1q6D; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 02:08:51 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rUdYP-0000000Eufe-1V8i; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 02:08:50 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECD6625E2; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 02:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C41EFC433F1; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 02:08:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706580528; bh=9rbN2HvYm15Z2jwGzV6r+HBEJq7Isl2UPLyDTEbxcjM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UBVG57rUvVFDePmvUcPAd+PIDQANfElIL1ePro+BBViUpKJ/HTkpE5y+oZ5Eukrt/ JEm+qIOOGnDf4jqxB0kqK0pwNOnwBMYtM47azf4GIKyw02aZWYbbo5ii6kTZ/xOr6h XDK+vHOhHR34NJZowx5ckdxhcA6Fugqk1iJJsmIGwBtg9uOv+tV85O0BgrzviuGV2k OskNhrEDxptrz3K75gqGAAq7rE2Zf10aOoKBQ8yI7BUIcsZEKuYQNsY2dGg7ug3q43 1/L811yqtyystB+COy/Ta3HfQP9suund893FsdIQa35x/kdQWOEnJ8XSDN9h8wKPiU 4CPcffBZb8jeA== Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:08:46 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Yunsheng Lin Cc: , , , , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , , , , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] remove page frag implementation in vhost_net Message-ID: <20240129180846.28937389@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <65eb8581-5cd8-8759-d598-c6711608b0c7@huawei.com> References: <20240123104250.9103-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <65eb8581-5cd8-8759-d598-c6711608b0c7@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240129_180849_480505_3F88755F X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.53 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:40:37 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: > Is this patchset supposed to go through vhost tree instead of net-next? > As the state is changed to 'Not applicable' in the netdevbpf patchwork, > according to maintainer-netdev.rst: > > Not applicable patch is expected to be applied outside of the networking > subsystem Sorry about the confusion, DaveM changed the way he uses the states since they were documented. There were concurrent changes to the gve driver, patches no longer apply. Could you rebase? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel