From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DDF6C4828F for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:28:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=7ooI4RC3D/UiykQBkiQf5auTPQ4pTZmfJu/5ghbvzZY=; b=MdTVC5PJiRShHK q+koPXmqN7Bo0ecH0FuD4+JaymzlmiuvLm9iNf3lNiNvRUaHiOBGtZz0Q5gPZlQnHqTbZdkvNdEdW u2qOIOCBdN/a1OMy5QwzWEzrT8R5PUfBqGQTRXwkpRSmvAqpWSMUlOQbO2igi/IFm17280r4cq+/u E+41BkKKRGBDMScg946Hwa0GoFU70hmnq2EjYgYPus2QItFiMzhuia1aRTrHMzBp0LvGI1GTaChU3 N5QPBoZhmXYDxK8BrQydi/rccFzkY4qgCVjz59+q7Jj/RooFmPDW72QGJuLPfe6pjeBgcj2HClh0Y vtINsQ9jYE3rGjbf1zCg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rXh22-0000000AdcT-1FAX; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 12:28:02 +0000 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rXh1y-0000000Adap-3G6H for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 12:28:00 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TVK6y1jhjz6K62N; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 20:24:26 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97A32140736; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 20:27:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.202.227.76) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:27:44 +0000 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:27:43 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Hojin Nam CC: "linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" , Wonjae Lee , KyungSan Kim , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "will@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf: CXL: fix mismatched cpmu event opcode Message-ID: <20240207122743.00004acc@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20240207042235epcms2p358e40f0409e25bd9e875ad1ae0dd0764@epcms2p3> References: <20240207042235epcms2p358e40f0409e25bd9e875ad1ae0dd0764@epcms2p3> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.202.227.76] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.25) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240207_042759_130076_6064F4E8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.68 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 07 Feb 2024 13:22:35 +0900 Hojin Nam wrote: > S2M NDR BI-ConflictAck opcode is described as 4 in the CXL > r3.1 3.3.9 Table 3.50. However, it is defined as 3 in macro definition. Also > adds s2m_ndr_cmpm for bit 3 that was added in CXL r3.1. > > Fixes: 5d7107c72796 ("perf: CXL Performance Monitoring Unit driver") > Signed-off-by: Hojin Nam Ah. Sorry I've mislead you. I lazily assumed this was in the 3.0 spec as well without checking. As a fix, we should not add the cmpm or update the reference comment. So should be the v1 patch with a reference to table 3-43 in r3.0 and the fixes tag. A follow up patch to add the 3.1 definitions would be excellent but we shouldn't be looking to backport that so it doesn't belong in the fix :( Jonathan > --- > > Hi Jonathan, > I've modified the commit messsge and code to reflect you mentioned. Thank you! > > Changes since v1: > - Add s2m_ndr_cmpm event attribute (Jonathan) > > > drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c > index 365d964b0f6a..d85d53d907a6 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c > +++ b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c > @@ -415,11 +415,12 @@ static struct attribute *cxl_pmu_event_attrs[] = { > CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_bisnp_curblk, CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_BISNP, BIT(4)), > CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_bisnp_datblk, CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_BISNP, BIT(5)), > CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_bisnp_invblk, CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_BISNP, BIT(6)), > - /* CXL rev 3.0 Table 3-43 S2M NDR Opcopdes */ > + /* CXL rev 3.1 Table 3-50 S2M NDR Opcopdes */ > CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_cmp, CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(0)), > CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_cmps, CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(1)), > CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_cmpe, CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(2)), > - CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_biconflictack, CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(3)), > + CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_cmpm, CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(3)), > + CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_biconflictack, CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(4)), > /* CXL rev 3.0 Table 3-46 S2M DRS opcodes */ > CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_drs_memdata, CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_DRS, BIT(0)), > CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_drs_memdatanxm, CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_DRS, BIT(1)), > -- > 2.34.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel