Re: [PATCH v3] clk: keystone: sci-clk: Adding support for non contiguous clocks

[Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>]

On 14:41-20240207, Udit Kumar wrote:
> Most of clocks and their parents are defined in contiguous range,
> But in few cases, there is gap in clock numbers[0].
> Driver assumes clocks to be in contiguous range, and add their clock
> ids incrementally.
> 
> New firmware started returning error while calling get_freq and is_on
> API for non-available clock ids.
> 
> In this fix, driver checks and adds only valid clock ids.
> 
> Fixes: 3c13933c6033 ("clk: keystone: sci-clk: add support for dynamically probing clocks")
> 
> [0] https://software-dl.ti.com/tisci/esd/latest/5_soc_doc/j7200/clocks.html
> Section Clocks for NAVSS0_CPTS_0 Device,
> clock id 12-15 not present.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
> ---
> Changelog
> Changes in v3
> - instead of get_freq, is_auto API is used to check validilty of clock
> - Address comments of v2, to have preindex increment
> Link to v2 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240206104357.3803517-1-u-kumar1@ti.com/
> 
> Changes in v2
> - Updated commit message
> - Simplified logic for valid clock id
> link to v1 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240205044557.3340848-1-u-kumar1@ti.com/
> 
> 
> P.S
> Firmawre returns total num_parents count including non available ids.
> For above device id NAVSS0_CPTS_0, number of parents clocks are 16
> i.e from id 2 to 17. But out of these ids few are not valid.
> So driver adds only valid clock ids out ot total.
> 
> Original logs
> https://gist.github.com/uditkumarti/de4b36b21247fb36725ad909ce4812f6#file-original-logs
> Line 2630 for error
> 
> Logs with fix v3
> https://gist.github.com/uditkumarti/94e3e28d62282fd708dbfe37435ce1d9#file-v3
> Line 2586
> 
> 
>  drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c b/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c
> index 35fe197dd303..31b7df05d7bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c
> @@ -516,6 +516,7 @@ static int ti_sci_scan_clocks_from_dt(struct sci_clk_provider *provider)
>  	struct sci_clk *sci_clk, *prev;
>  	int num_clks = 0;
>  	int num_parents;
> +	bool state;
>  	int clk_id;
>  	const char * const clk_names[] = {
>  		"clocks", "assigned-clocks", "assigned-clock-parents", NULL
> @@ -583,16 +584,23 @@ static int ti_sci_scan_clocks_from_dt(struct sci_clk_provider *provider)
>  					num_parents = 255;
>  				}
>  
> -				clk_id = args.args[1] + 1;
> +				clk_id = args.args[1];
>  
>  				while (num_parents--) {
> +					/* Check if this clock id is valid */
> +					ret = provider->ops->is_auto(provider->sci,
> +						sci_clk->dev_id, ++clk_id, &state);

A bit too nice coding ;) => I had been confused momentarily by clk_id = args.args[1]
change just above till I saw that you are pre-incrementing
clk_id - Is there a harm in leaving the original clk_id increment logic
alone (it was much simpler to read up)?

> +
> +					if (ret)
> +						continue;
> +
>  					sci_clk = devm_kzalloc(dev,
>  							       sizeof(*sci_clk),
>  							       GFP_KERNEL);
>  					if (!sci_clk)
>  						return -ENOMEM;
>  					sci_clk->dev_id = args.args[0];
> -					sci_clk->clk_id = clk_id++;
> +					sci_clk->clk_id = clk_id;
>  					sci_clk->provider = provider;
>  					list_add_tail(&sci_clk->node, &clks);
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel