From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxarm@huawei.com,
kevin.tian@intel.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org,
oliver.upton@linux.dev, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
jean-philippe@linaro.org, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] iommufd: Associate kvm pointer to iommufd ctx
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 11:42:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240208154210.GP31743@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240208151837.35068-5-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:18:34PM +0000, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h
> index 991f864d1f9b..28ede82bb1a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct iommu_domain;
> struct iommu_group;
> struct iommu_option;
> struct iommufd_device;
> +struct kvm;
>
> struct iommufd_ctx {
> struct file *file;
> @@ -27,6 +28,8 @@ struct iommufd_ctx {
> /* Compatibility with VFIO no iommu */
> u8 no_iommu_mode;
> struct iommufd_ioas *vfio_ioas;
> + /* Associated KVM pointer */
> + struct kvm *kvm;
> };
Associating the KVM with the entire iommufd is a big hammer, is this
what we want to do?
I know it has to be linked to domain allocation and the coming
"viommu" object, and it is already linked to VFIO.
It means we support one KVM per iommufd (which doesn't seem
unreasonable, but also the first time we've had such a limitation)
The other option would be to pass in the kvm to the individual sub
objects.
Kevin?
Sean would you be OK with this approach considering your other series
to try to make more of this private?
Jason
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-08 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-08 15:18 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use pinned KVM VMID for stage 2 Shameer Kolothum
2024-02-08 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: Add generic infrastructure to support pinned VMIDs Shameer Kolothum
2024-06-24 15:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-08 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: arm64: Introduce support to pin VMIDs Shameer Kolothum
2024-06-24 19:22 ` Oliver Upton
2024-06-24 19:34 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-06-24 19:52 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-08 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: arm64: Add interfaces for pinned VMID support Shameer Kolothum
2024-02-08 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] iommufd: Associate kvm pointer to iommufd ctx Shameer Kolothum
2024-02-08 15:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-06-24 16:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-24 17:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-24 17:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-24 18:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-24 19:12 ` Oliver Upton
2024-06-24 19:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-24 19:51 ` Oliver Upton
2024-06-24 22:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-25 2:21 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-06-24 19:13 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-06-25 1:53 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-02-08 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] iommu: Pass in kvm pointer to domain_alloc_user Shameer Kolothum
2024-02-08 15:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-08 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use KVM VMID for s2 stage Shameer Kolothum
2024-02-08 15:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-08 16:14 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-02-08 16:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-08 16:36 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-02-08 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable broadcast TLB maintenance Shameer Kolothum
2024-02-08 15:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use pinned KVM VMID for stage 2 Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-08 15:49 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-02-08 16:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-09 11:58 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2024-02-09 12:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-09 13:54 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240208154210.GP31743@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).