linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Convert to domain_alloc_paging()
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:54:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240213115423.GG4048826@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240213111623.GA28517@willie-the-truck>

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 11:16:23AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:55:38PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 12:20, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> > > On 2024-02-13 7:51 am, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 at 00:23, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > > >> And then we may get a clue from the backtraces it generates. I only
> > > >> saw one iommu group reported in your log so I'd expect one trace?
> > > >
> > > > I added dev_info + mdelays() around the arm_smmu_init_domain_context()
> > > > and I can see that it crashes within that function.
> > >
> > > Yeah, this is totally broken. We can't just call the unmodified
> > > arm_smmu_init_domain_context() at domain allocation because half of what
> > > it's doing belongs to the attach operation. We should not be allocating
> > > context banks, IRQs, etc. for a not-yet-attached domain, and we
> > > certainly shouldn't be touching hardware there outside of RPM.
> > 
> > Should I send a revert?
> 
> If reverting the patch fixes the issue for you, then yes please!

Not the whole thing though, just remove the 'if (dev)' like you
tested, thanks.

If you want I will send it

> Hopefully you can help Jason test a reworked verson for the future, as
> it's evident that Tegra doesn't tickle the power management side of things
> in the same way.

It can stay, as long as it uses the alloc_domain_paging() that is
enough for the core code to move forward.

I included it only because we were able to test it, most of the other
drivers I did not try to move their "finalize".

Jason

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-13 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-17 18:11 [PATCH v2 0/5] Convert SMMU to domain_alloc_paging() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-17 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Reorganize arm_smmu_domain_add_master() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-17 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Convert to a global static identity domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-12 13:27   ` Will Deacon
2023-12-12 14:15     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-13 13:26       ` Will Deacon
2023-12-13 13:32         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-17 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-17 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Pass arm_smmu_domain to internal functions Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-17 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Convert to domain_alloc_paging() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-12 13:26   ` Will Deacon
2023-12-12 14:03     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-12 14:10       ` Will Deacon
2023-12-13 13:27         ` Will Deacon
2023-12-13 13:32           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-09 20:05   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-09 22:23     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-12 23:18       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-13  0:19         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-13  7:51       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-13 10:20         ` Robin Murphy
2024-02-13 10:55           ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-13 11:16             ` Will Deacon
2024-02-13 11:54               ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-12-13 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Convert SMMU " Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240213115423.GG4048826@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).