From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ardb@kernel.org,catalin.marinas@arm.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,keescook@chromium.org,liaochang1@huawei.com,linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,mark.rutland@arm.com,will@kernel.org,xiangyang3@huawei.com,xiujianfeng@huawei.com
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "Revert "arm64: Stash shadow stack pointer in the task struct on interrupt"" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:31:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024022047-democrat-persuader-ef91@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240219132153.378265-1-xiangyang3@huawei.com>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
Revert "arm64: Stash shadow stack pointer in the task struct on interrupt"
to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
revert-arm64-stash-shadow-stack-pointer-in-the-task-struct-on-interrupt.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From xiangyang3@huawei.com Tue Feb 20 16:30:54 2024
From: Xiang Yang <xiangyang3@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 21:21:53 +0800
Subject: Revert "arm64: Stash shadow stack pointer in the task struct on interrupt"
To: <ardb@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>
Cc: <keescook@chromium.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <xiangyang3@huawei.com>, <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>, <liaochang1@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20240219132153.378265-1-xiangyang3@huawei.com>
This reverts commit 3f225f29c69c13ce1cbdb1d607a42efeef080056 which is
commit 59b37fe52f49955791a460752c37145f1afdcad1 upstream.
The shadow call stack for irq now is stored in current task's thread info
in irq_stack_entry. There is a possibility that we have some soft irqs
pending at the end of hard irq, and when we process softirq with the irq
enabled, irq_stack_entry will enter again and overwrite the shadow call
stack whitch stored in current task's thread info, leading to the
incorrect shadow call stack restoration for the first entry of the hard
IRQ, then the system end up with a panic.
task A | task A
-------------------------------------+------------------------------------
el1_irq //irq1 enter |
irq_handler //save scs_sp1 |
gic_handle_irq |
irq_exit |
__do_softirq |
| el1_irq //irq2 enter
| irq_handler //save scs_sp2
| //overwrite scs_sp1
| ...
| irq_stack_exit //restore scs_sp2
irq_stack_exit //restore wrong |
//scs_sp2 |
So revert this commit to fix it.
Fixes: 3f225f29c69c ("arm64: Stash shadow stack pointer in the task struct on interrupt")
Signed-off-by: Xiang Yang <xiangyang3@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -431,7 +431,9 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__swpan_exit_el0)
.macro irq_stack_entry
mov x19, sp // preserve the original sp
- scs_save tsk // preserve the original shadow stack
+#ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
+ mov x24, scs_sp // preserve the original shadow stack
+#endif
/*
* Compare sp with the base of the task stack.
@@ -465,7 +467,9 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__swpan_exit_el0)
*/
.macro irq_stack_exit
mov sp, x19
- scs_load_current
+#ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
+ mov scs_sp, x24
+#endif
.endm
/* GPRs used by entry code */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from xiangyang3@huawei.com are
queue-5.10/revert-arm64-stash-shadow-stack-pointer-in-the-task-struct-on-interrupt.patch
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-20 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-19 13:21 [PATCH 5.10.y v2] Revert "arm64: Stash shadow stack pointer in the task struct on interrupt" Xiang Yang
2024-02-19 16:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-02-20 15:31 ` Greg KH
2024-02-20 15:31 ` gregkh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024022047-democrat-persuader-ef91@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xiangyang3@huawei.com \
--cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).