From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A685C48BF6 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:57:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=UVYPseF5Yw7YN6rSys48upM9VaTPswS3rHtCYSN1LWU=; b=I0pNuqjHdrEbak CYwUVBq+4EscudWDRRsp0RYscIGX8qUfZ1aSxjlSQ6M8LdRw2k9yHPfLJIOc8S+DJ6Wa0Wt3y12AF vFChEaOc2QZyHzfH+PdhouVaoLqjwjUxJrXodiWQn/Twe/5rQp4YJadMrEUdDERXRDmOdPgzBM+4W lwiny9S3VndspiVz2P4zwSj88oMC2bwh1IqDMYPpl8rWdhvljDgqFN2ZFOuEZKmaPIM8RPwS0o/He tdHKguB/XUZx0OtiPUu1QTLhCNvyBEUarZS7CbKLxhdibsyYxw4udNPxNOj7vDtUtgxHjLC6K4ptT jwGhJUo3NRm9F9WMhpww==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rdvL5-0000000DHIy-10kN; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:57:27 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rdvL2-0000000DHIZ-26Mi for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:57:25 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C5E60B2F; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E09E2C433C7; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:57:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1708793843; bh=b1/O19NtIgvo/C+lW8h+C0KQWgkOYejs2p1WPoFlrhQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=o0SNdABSZnstzIU5Tkf/2awpLbq6irmAkpVOB826tfoe+pTjmSkJv7cWfXBql67Cy 2ykl6W0SfHuZQKaM7IDFV4s0rolTsZlDVJD6weRIv1T2x5EEmbpa+ACLQScmDPEYcu YKhO5EHBaxgAeMKVyF788hgYzJIuqnLPfH9frtZS/zJm1jJ59LlFsXXNja5y+60Rlw Dbzo/da4Zum8Sdp/+fuiXvZAkU3ultlDRy0pZMZaWWcCpdfnMGdoJ7ys4tBN1LYXnC NG5yZTgqyODzmpC773fHbt+nCY6qm4yGyx44JMj6nxrI3QXhybydAkPiZhFnnVVrUg GgCeUxwIy2yMg== Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:57:06 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: David Lechner Cc: Mark Brown , Martin Sperl , David Jander , Michael Hennerich , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , Alain Volmat , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Julien Stephan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] iio: adc: ad7380: use spi_optimize_message() Message-ID: <20240224165706.18cc0d7e@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <20240219-mainline-spi-precook-message-v2-5-4a762c6701b9@baylibre.com> References: <20240219-mainline-spi-precook-message-v2-0-4a762c6701b9@baylibre.com> <20240219-mainline-spi-precook-message-v2-5-4a762c6701b9@baylibre.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240224_085724_615385_D06BED07 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.25 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:33:22 -0600 David Lechner wrote: > This modifies the ad7380 ADC driver to use spi_optimize_message() to > optimize the SPI message for the buffered read operation. Since buffered > reads reuse the same SPI message for each read, this can improve > performance by reducing the overhead of setting up some parts the SPI > message in each spi_sync() call. > > Signed-off-by: David Lechner Looks good to me. As this is the driver you asked me to drop earlier this cycle, how do we plan to merge this series? If Mark is fine taking 1-4 with the user following along that's fine by me, if not I guess we are in immutable tree territory for next cycle? Jonathan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel