* [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Rationalise KVM banner output
@ 2024-03-21 17:37 Marc Zyngier
2024-04-01 8:47 ` Oliver Upton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2024-03-21 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Oliver Upton, Zenghui Yu
We are not very consistent when it comes to displaying which mode
we're in (VHE, {n,h}VHE, protected or not). For example, booting
in protected mode with hVHE results in:
[ 0.969545] kvm [1]: Protected nVHE mode initialized successfully
which is mildly amusing considering that the machine is VHE only.
We already cleaned this up a bit with commit 1f3ca7023fe6 ("KVM:
arm64: print Hyp mode"), but that's still unsatisfactory.
Unify the three strings into one and use a mess of conditional
statements to sort it out (yes, it's a slow day).
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 13 +++++--------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index eff66ff0c7d8..cc18caaa1c64 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -2702,14 +2702,11 @@ static __init int kvm_arm_init(void)
if (err)
goto out_hyp;
- if (is_protected_kvm_enabled()) {
- kvm_info("Protected nVHE mode initialized successfully\n");
- } else if (in_hyp_mode) {
- kvm_info("VHE mode initialized successfully\n");
- } else {
- char mode = cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_KVM_HVHE) ? 'h' : 'n';
- kvm_info("Hyp mode (%cVHE) initialized successfully\n", mode);
- }
+ kvm_info("%s%sVHE mode initialized successfully\n",
+ in_hyp_mode ? "" : (is_protected_kvm_enabled() ?
+ "Protected " : "Hyp "),
+ in_hyp_mode ? "" : (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_KVM_HVHE) ?
+ "h" : "n"));
/*
* FIXME: Do something reasonable if kvm_init() fails after pKVM
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Rationalise KVM banner output
2024-03-21 17:37 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Rationalise KVM banner output Marc Zyngier
@ 2024-04-01 8:47 ` Oliver Upton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2024-04-01 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, Marc Zyngier
Cc: Oliver Upton, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:37:06 +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> We are not very consistent when it comes to displaying which mode
> we're in (VHE, {n,h}VHE, protected or not). For example, booting
> in protected mode with hVHE results in:
>
> [ 0.969545] kvm [1]: Protected nVHE mode initialized successfully
>
> which is mildly amusing considering that the machine is VHE only.
>
> [...]
Applied to kvmarm/fixes, thanks!
[1/1] KVM: arm64: Rationalise KVM banner output
commit: d96c66ab9fb3ad8b243669cf6b41e68d0f7f9ecd
--
Best,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-01 8:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-21 17:37 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Rationalise KVM banner output Marc Zyngier
2024-04-01 8:47 ` Oliver Upton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).