From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22C23C4345F for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:39:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=GmDF+O2fb7sIvJOLY7djBE2JirlA4lxipgS95VGJcRk=; b=P5+4NTYUcInrxF 03hIrcS5MLso4eutoTlOpUiO68HuUi2Jps0WrpDmOdTKrMkM3+Fg5V0/4QIro/RM5j9LDbMtNOkcN s2DBvhmjbvapPTlYvc5HRAypQX+KwqhY18JlhzQsZFYvVZ+KqIOY0jwMxzPuAzGRsDGS1+fsM1LGb NTny7nlu5jpWUyzBKBeFfo/C8vDIw+nlt1YPLm7r41HVJW7xu6uKTE7PAp3P/xAwH2Y1NN/EnVU0h ikOl25zN5XgnqtmR+ehN0tVuuEgp/w7Fo/Ex8jasbRaWw+QXXDVhN2mZCGpntd26LSPgjupUSK6VP icTSJw86myg77o6FrSmQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rx1l6-0000000FRmH-1cTo; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:39:16 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rx1l0-0000000FRjn-3t7F for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:39:12 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3A21477; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 02:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e125905.cambridge.arm.com (e125905.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.73]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B5D333F64C; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 02:39:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Beata Michalska To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, sumitg@nvidia.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, lihuisong@huawei.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org Subject: [PATCH v5 5/5] cpufreq: Use arch specific feedback for cpuinfo_cur_freq Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 10:38:48 +0100 Message-Id: <20240417093848.1555462-6-beata.michalska@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20240417093848.1555462-1-beata.michalska@arm.com> References: <20240417093848.1555462-1-beata.michalska@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240417_023911_040033_6C0E0CD8 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.53 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Some architectures provide a way to determine an average frequency over a certain period of time based on available performance monitors (AMU on ARM or APERF/MPERf on x86). With those at hand, enroll arch_freq_get_on_cpu into cpuinfo_cur_freq policy sysfs attribute handler, which is expected to represent the current frequency of a given CPU,as obtained by the hardware. This is the type of feedback that counters do provide. Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index f6f8d7f450e7..89118406ec68 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -793,8 +793,10 @@ store_one(scaling_max_freq, max); static ssize_t show_cpuinfo_cur_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) { - unsigned int cur_freq = __cpufreq_get(policy); + unsigned int cur_freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(policy->cpu); + if (!cur_freq) + cur_freq = __cpufreq_get(policy); if (cur_freq) return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", cur_freq); -- 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel