From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0499EC4345F for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:54:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=hi+G5SzcnONGHXT2gMEGa4AGYtWxnEHQ31wZPBZQRE8=; b=sJDo6H02oFn7+w cxt75BxhhffbjnSojnvWJXLtIklvJwe6cMA8rJx1JYR90oor8QGTPLOVLAvRZn07KWkp5dcJOwDPm cM+zS7OeHc1yKeM54eZCbMMIDeButDvW2C53wi+iQl7dawlpDi/2r2bIq9nk/rrfiQA1s/DMtO7l3 VonmiN8oKJWn5JrVwbEO5bDeJyMefGdGelKaic2PiyCZKqyxDTJXNZ7BeJh1+SsxbL3S0bMOIf2eD VGeKsMmiq31zhmZzKziW4uh4WCf4TUr0G2rQ0U9xDGjxCqdBR29U+JUCtIPUK8q4pSrYOwC0gScuQ pi6/YxQnE+vs61PQ+1wg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rxhCC-00000004VR9-0MEd; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:54:00 +0000 Received: from mail5.25mail.st ([74.50.62.9]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rxhC7-00000004VQB-0D0p for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:53:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (91-158-86-216.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.158.86.216]) by mail5.25mail.st (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AD5360506; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:52:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=atomide.com; s=25mailst; t=1713506028; bh=y50jgZzX1tasZ1nJ/OeWEJ4WOTL45ZecBsv9LB8WKxE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=TcWyMBhdTIv3N992WKxfFLFq81in7QH91G9P0WAYnavKogt3hy2hfS0qo6q8+L7cN EBH3kGkErEL7PV48gC+OnabBcEyL+6dXMiiBRYx2ys87yJjeq4VCjC1dcLFwmZ7wja 3SBpj140XWPmNXI9iHBfI6gLbONttj0MgCONGQOXYoaBPEedc4sz5SZ2YJp4AjBhNs wbrUuOgQ1wMY80rJWeM0GgGWUSxYzbgqHN5SFTI1meRab4lURyD0ppqdgWVsZoEimP aUSDr8yEkp5bU3ZKUnDoFava3Q+Gf/LO6RziV/5/E++P7fAMcGF0um9C5VP7YoHNDC tAxYBPfodmE7g== Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:52:49 +0300 From: Tony Lindgren To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Aaro Koskinen , Adam Ford , Andreas Kemnade , Andrew Davis , Arnd Bergmann , =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt?= Cousson , Carl Philipp Klemm , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Jarkko Nikula , Janusz Krzysztofik , Keerthy , Kevin Hilman , Linus Walleij , Merlijn Wajer , Nishanth Menon , Olof Johansson , Paul Walmsley , Peter Ujfalusi , Praneeth Bajjuri , Roger Quadros , Russell King , Santosh Shilimkar , "Sicelo A. Mhlongo" , Tero Kristo , Tomi Valkeinen , Vignesh R Subject: Adding more mach-omap2 maintainers Message-ID: <20240419055249.GE5156@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240418_225355_500528_5C60CE7D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.61 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi all, I want to add some more maintainers for omaps to ensure continued support. There are many generations of omaps, and having multiple maintainers allows us to split the work. The earlier split by category to things like PM, clocks, and SoC core interconnect hwmod/ti-sysc no longer exactly current as the work has been completed, and people have moved on. TI is naturally mainly interested in their active parts am3, am4 and dra7. Additionally, the community folks are interested in maintaining also some of the older devices, mostly based on omap3 and omap4. So I'd like to add two maintainers from TI, and two community maintainers. This allows both the TI and community maintainers take turns with the merge windows and chasing down regressions. I've started working full time at Intel and will be stepping back. I'll be still around here and there too as a hobbyist maintainer tinkering with some mobile devices I use :) Over the past week, I've privately asked some folks who I trust to help. I started with people who have been active recently related to omap touching SoC devices. >From folks working on TI SoCs, I'd like to have Andrew Davis and Roger Quardos to join. They both have a long history on working on omap based devices, and are actively working on the SoC devices that are used both for omaps and the new K3 SoCs. Kevin Hilman might be also able to help a bit on some related Linux generic issues. >From the community side, I'd like to have Aaro Koskinen and Andreas Kemnade to join. Both Aaro and Andreas have been working on multiple mainline supported omap devices such as n900 and gta04. I'd assume we get the final list sorted out over next week or so and then I'll send a patch for the MAINTAINERS file. I've tried to Cc a bunch of folks who have been involved, but probably missed lots of folks who have been involved, so please add to Cc as needed. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel