From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hardening: Refresh KCFI options, add some more
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:25:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202404301424.FF88864115@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202404301409.D3BC98D5@keescook>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 02:15:53PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:48:36AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:21:40AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 03:29:44PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > >
> > > > - CONFIG_CFI_CLANG=y for x86 and arm64. (And disable FINEIBT since
> > > > it isn't as secure as straight KCFI.)
> > >
> > > Oi ?
> >
> > Same objection I always had[1]: moving the check into the destination
> > means attacks with control over executable memory contents can just omit
> > the check.
> >
> > But now that I went to go look I see 0c3e806ec0f9 ("x86/cfi: Add boot
> > time hash randomization") is only enabled under FINEIBT... seems better
> > if that were always enabled...
>
> And FINEIBT actually can't be disabled... :|
>
> And as it turns out CFI_CLANG doesn't work at all on v6.9...
>
> [ 0.587220] no CFI hash found at: __call_sites+0x339a8/0x34450 ffffffffac20cef8 00 00 00 00 00
> [ 0.588226] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:1182 __apply_fineibt+0x7a9/0x820
> ...
> [ 0.619220] SMP alternatives: Something went horribly wrong trying to rewrite the CFI implementation.
> *hang*
Welcome to my TED talk.
I'll keep debugging this: boots fine on v6.8, but booting v6.9 with
defconfig+CFI_CLANG _does_ work, so something in my .config broke it...
--
Kees Cook
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-30 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-26 22:29 [PATCH] hardening: Refresh KCFI options, add some more Kees Cook
2024-04-29 22:16 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-04-30 5:35 ` Kees Cook
2024-04-30 15:12 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-04-30 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-30 17:48 ` Kees Cook
2024-04-30 21:15 ` Kees Cook
2024-04-30 21:25 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-05-01 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-01 19:27 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202404301424.FF88864115@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).