From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
<loongarch@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
<x86@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<justin.he@arm.com>, <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 06/19] ACPI: processor: Move checks and availability of acpi_processor earlier
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:24:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240430142434.10471-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240430142434.10471-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Make the per_cpu(processors, cpu) entries available earlier so that
they are available in arch_register_cpu() as ARM64 will need access
to the acpi_handle to distinguish between acpi_processor_add()
and earlier registration attempts (which will fail as _STA cannot
be checked).
Reorder the remove flow to clear this per_cpu() after
arch_unregister_cpu() has completed, allowing it to be used in
there as well.
Note that on x86 for the CPU hotplug case, the pr->id prior to
acpi_map_cpu() may be invalid. Thus the per_cpu() structures
must be initialized after that call or after checking the ID
is valid (not hotplug path).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
v9: Add back a blank line accidentally removed in code move.
Fix up error returns so that the new cleanup in processor_add()
is triggered on detection of the bios bug.
Combined with the previous 2 patches, should solve the leak
that Gavin identified.
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 16e36e55a560..4a79b42d649e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -183,8 +183,38 @@ static void __init acpi_pcc_cpufreq_init(void) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
/* Initialization */
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array);
+
+static bool acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(struct acpi_processor *pr,
+ struct acpi_device *device)
+{
+ BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids);
+
+ /*
+ * Buggy BIOS check.
+ * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS.
+ * Don't trust it blindly
+ */
+ if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL &&
+ per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) {
+ dev_warn(&device->dev,
+ "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n",
+ pr->id);
+ return false;
+ }
+ /*
+ * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS
+ * checks.
+ */
+ per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device;
+ per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
-static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
+static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr,
+ struct acpi_device *device)
{
int ret;
@@ -198,8 +228,16 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
if (ret)
goto out;
+ if (!acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
ret = arch_register_cpu(pr->id);
if (ret) {
+ /* Leave the processor device array in place to detect buggy bios */
+ per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id);
goto out;
}
@@ -217,7 +255,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
return ret;
}
#else
-static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
+static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr,
+ struct acpi_device *device)
{
return -ENODEV;
}
@@ -316,10 +355,13 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
* because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now.
*/
if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) {
- int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr);
+ int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr, device);
if (ret)
return ret;
+ } else {
+ if (!acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device))
+ return -EINVAL;
}
/*
@@ -365,8 +407,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
* (cpu_data(cpu)) values, like CPU feature flags, family, model, etc.
* Such things have to be put in and set up by the processor driver's .probe().
*/
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array);
-
static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
const struct acpi_device_id *id)
{
@@ -395,28 +435,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */
goto err_clear_driver_data;
- BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids);
-
- /*
- * Buggy BIOS check.
- * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS.
- * Don't trust it blindly
- */
- if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL &&
- per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) {
- dev_warn(&device->dev,
- "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n",
- pr->id);
- /* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */
- goto err_clear_driver_data;
- }
- /*
- * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS
- * checks.
- */
- per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device;
- per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr;
-
dev = get_cpu_device(pr->id);
if (!dev) {
result = -ENODEV;
@@ -470,10 +488,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
device_release_driver(pr->dev);
acpi_unbind_one(pr->dev);
- /* Clean up. */
- per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL;
- per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
-
cpu_maps_update_begin();
cpus_write_lock();
@@ -481,6 +495,10 @@ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
arch_unregister_cpu(pr->id);
acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id);
+ /* Clean up. */
+ per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL;
+ per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
+
cpus_write_unlock();
cpu_maps_update_done();
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-30 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-30 14:24 [PATCH v9 00/19] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 01/19] ACPI: processor: Simplify initial onlining to use same path for cold and hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-02 12:10 ` Miguel Luis
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 02/19] cpu: Do not warn on arch_register_cpu() returning -EPROBE_DEFER Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 03/19] ACPI: processor: Drop duplicated check on _STA (enabled + present) Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 04/19] ACPI: processor: Return an error if acpi_processor_get_info() fails in processor_add() Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-01 10:18 ` Gavin Shan
2024-05-07 18:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 05/19] ACPI: processor: Fix memory leaks in error paths of processor_add() Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-01 10:19 ` Gavin Shan
2024-05-07 18:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-30 14:24 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-05-01 10:33 ` [PATCH v9 06/19] ACPI: processor: Move checks and availability of acpi_processor earlier Gavin Shan
2024-05-07 19:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-05-08 8:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 07/19] ACPI: processor: Add acpi_get_processor_handle() helper Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-07 19:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 08/19] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 09/19] ACPI: scan: switch to flags for acpi_scan_check_and_detach() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 10/19] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 11/19] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 12/19] arm64: acpi: Harden get_cpu_for_acpi_id() against missing CPU entry Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-01 11:10 ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 13/19] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 14/19] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 15/19] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 16/19] arm64: arch_register_cpu() variant to check if an ACPI handle is now available Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 17/19] arm64: Kconfig: Enable hotplug CPU on arm64 if ACPI_PROCESSOR is enabled Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-01 11:13 ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 18/19] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-01 11:32 ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v9 19/19] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-01 11:14 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240430142434.10471-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
--cc=justin.he@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).