From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Yazan Shhady <yazan.shhady@solid-run.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: arm64: marvell: add solidrun cn9132 CEX-7 evaluation board
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 17:00:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240509-recycler-flask-0b3b7e2802f9@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5da207e2-1579-4056-9e3f-c25f5b14e225@solid-run.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1914 bytes --]
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:49:13AM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote:
> Am 09.05.24 um 12:46 schrieb Josua Mayer:
> > Add bindings for the SolidRun CN9132 COM-Express Type 7 evaluation board.
> > The CEX is based on CN9130 SoC and includes two southbridges.
> >
> > Because CN9132 and 9131 are just names for different designs around the
> > same SoC, no soc compatibles beside marvell,cn9130 are needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
> > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
> > index 74d935ea279c..538d91be8857 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
> > @@ -92,4 +92,12 @@ properties:
> > - const: solidrun,cn9130-sr-som
> > - const: marvell,cn9130
> >
> > + - description:
> > + SolidRun CN9132 COM-Express Type 7 based single-board computers
> > + items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - solidrun,cn9132-clearfog
> > + - const: solidrun,cn9132-sr-cex7
> > + - const: marvell,cn9130
> > +
> > additionalProperties: true
> >
> It appears I will not be able to submit actual device-tree for this
> board. Therefore when applying this patch-set, it may be skipped.
>
> I am not sure about the policy in this case,
> if it is better to pick or skip.
What do you mean my "not be able to"? Does the device exist? If it does
then, I at least, have no objection to documenting a compatible for it.
Cheers,
Conor.
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-09 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-09 10:46 [PATCH v5 0/4] arm64: dts: add description for solidrun cn9130 som and clearfog boards Josua Mayer
2024-05-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: arm64: marvell: add solidrun cn9130 som based boards Josua Mayer
2024-05-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: arm64: marvell: add solidrun cn9132 CEX-7 evaluation board Josua Mayer
2024-05-09 10:49 ` Josua Mayer
2024-05-09 16:00 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2024-05-09 16:10 ` Josua Mayer
2024-05-09 16:15 ` Josua Mayer
2024-05-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] arm64: dts: add description for solidrun cn9130 som and clearfog boards Josua Mayer
2024-05-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] arm64: dts: add description for solidrun cn9131 solidwan board Josua Mayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240509-recycler-flask-0b3b7e2802f9@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=josua@solid-run.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=yazan.shhady@solid-run.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox