From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 635AEC25B74 for ; Thu, 16 May 2024 06:57:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date: Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date :Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=33TkK6vj0yeiMqG56Qi97AQKyJk3R3f/z0RMCUH87Eg=; b=FMc8b0N+syH655ApmaM2sx4H+I bbhwN3QZinD4iD8bQa7KbZAZgU1Fiec/C3rUvWhLSmi8JUbNBJgzfj9ZDLtRsbCwFX0s/YjM6SoFO qhcsXUP5rknEO/WSzsAIENUDEn0CWYls4DM0pm/lgAFoUgfgIWHX4mmUaD3F5yigkEuHxeIltj0JM KQOOdQ/rd7P34C9UnQuK1o2CrwuVExNad/EOJldyjjiVXcrQtqTI6fLOYWHr0BPDFFRbtHGVWCJO6 4JU2vU4IhDUV25Oxz3VebZ22y5QczjybuKZnOZf83jaySjEFEmWtjelHv2kVudujWcUZv8nap5kkG mz1w3YjQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s7V3T-00000003vGO-2bYH; Thu, 16 May 2024 06:57:31 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s7V3P-00000003vFM-2b6B; Thu, 16 May 2024 06:57:28 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1715842647; x=1747378647; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=6IjZadEQJIHv5tk4TwGJe6gpZ6evHRuOZzcAlcgqyk4=; b=W9gUc+jRrwk9IAR+vbbzTQ6n6igirpN61JcqNyN0MkucH1zZ6LvDCx62 hByScS1zEQD4z8sKpd1i7wxqSn3bVLy4McIt+089OmUNre5nnPBY/Vgsp tmpSol9ShiJPBAeMhvaRLZMf0fRS51ruYYF5+0TYiqiPPs6vRJ5k7tdvY xrlYw6ld963k2xJv6RVYJ89xcRSJ9t2uEpk20FQwzrl6yxsmC9QuWVnF8 jkIRydGT+ioUJAyYMWTbVpeChWTi4OFHaTk2FFlEG+w2987Ckz+stHepe HgHxCbfoVxJj4Cguf4prQq3MQ66emgJRvlmOLgRPQIwfnVUD5t/SFwszw g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: muChaTU1T4yrMkfn1JCFOg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OTNc74XwSLi6GypTtBzPMw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,163,1712646000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="192313660" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 15 May 2024 23:57:26 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 15 May 2024 23:56:56 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.85.11) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 15 May 2024 23:56:53 -0700 Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 07:56:39 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Kanak Shilledar CC: Conor Dooley , , Kanak Shilledar , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Florian Fainelli , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , Broadcom internal kernel review list , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: spi: brcm,bcm2835-spi: convert to dtschema Message-ID: <20240516-encourage-bouncing-77e9c14c9887@wendy> References: <20240514070051.2959-1-kanakshilledar111@protonmail.com> <20240514-sitting-ritzy-498d35eb5ac8@spud> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240515_235727_746614_909D65B4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 27.18 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2741840953344542925==" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --===============2741840953344542925== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0nhWKHEN5fKFMQ8b" Content-Disposition: inline --0nhWKHEN5fKFMQ8b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:44=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley = wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 12:30:47PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote: > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > - Updated DCO email address > > > > I was really hoping you'd tell me why you'd not used the same email > > address, rather than just sending another version. My ulterior motive is > > that I wrote the section in email-clients.rst saying that protonmail had > > WKD issues with kernel.org accounts but apparently proton added a > > workaround and have yet to be sent an email that confirmed that the > > workaround fixed things. (I'm not sure that the WKD issues ever applied > > as there's no GPG key posted for conor+dt@kernel.org, only > > conor@kernel.org). >=20 > Oh, I am primarily using protonmail and I am aware that there are some > issues with protonmail and kernel.org so for that reason I am sending my > patches via @gmail.com address. I was trying out some things with > gmail and proton so had changed my signing email address to @gmail.com > apart from sending emails I have no motive on using gmail.com account. > Also I am adding my protonmail account in the `CC`. > Hope this helps. > If this is not the intended route then I will change it and stick > to one email address. I don't care what email you use for stuff, that's your business. I just want to know if we can remove the section from the docs that says not to use proton. Maybe you could send me an off-list email to conor@kernel.org from your proton account, so I can see if it ends up getting encrypted? That'd be helpful if you could. > > The patch is fine IMO though, so > > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley >=20 > Do I need to roll out another version with this reviewed by flag? No, Mark should be able to pick that up. There's usually no need to resend patches solely pick up tags, that's the maintainer's responsibility. If you're resending for any other reason, then yes, pick up tags. Cheers, Conor. --0nhWKHEN5fKFMQ8b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZkWuJwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0gN/AQCnEN4vuOOsE6DO4QFtsxZtw+1x1mtb49PyKpWtqtPQ8QD/RhI9DwfjF5Tp CnTBU0ZQV31OVZpr1OkYHZWVykwLGwM= =uPOG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0nhWKHEN5fKFMQ8b-- --===============2741840953344542925== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============2741840953344542925==--