From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
cristian.marussi@arm.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com,
imx@lists.linux.dev, aisheng.dong@nxp.com,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add properties for i.MX95 Pinctrl OEM extensions
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 14:49:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240520194942.GA1374705-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240516073012.1699795-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:30:12PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> i.MX95 Pinctrl is managed by System Control Management Interface(SCMI)
> firmware using OEM extensions. No functions, no groups are provided by
> the firmware. So add i.MX95 specific properties.
>
> To keep aligned with current i.MX pinctrl bindings, still use "fsl,pins"
> for i.MX95.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>
> V1:
> There is already a v6 version for i.MX95 pinctrl with binding got reviewed by
> Rob, https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240513-pinctrl-scmi-oem-v3-v6-1-904975c99cc4@nxp.com/
> But after NXP internal discussion, to keep "fsl,pins" for i.MX95 would make
> it aligned with current i.MX93/8M/7 bindings which people are familiar with,
> and easy to understand.
>
> Sorry to bring back so late after your reviewing in previous generic binding
> patch. This is not to reject the v6 patch, just wanna to see whether you are
> happy with "fsl,pins" for i.MX95. If people are happy to accept, I will post
> out driver together with this patch in new patchset to reject v6. If people are
> not happy, we could continue with v6.
It is fine for me.
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-20 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-16 7:30 [RFC] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add properties for i.MX95 Pinctrl OEM extensions Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-05-16 14:40 ` Frank Li
2024-05-21 6:16 ` Peng Fan
2024-05-20 19:49 ` Rob Herring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240520194942.GA1374705-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).