From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41E9DC25B77 for ; Mon, 20 May 2024 19:50:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=4AHCEPpxy11rKVyWfFX1t4mMLJGNqUUzXRz8nZMvmVI=; b=ajcCU90cviwMaB pxUdE7gAiWnAe0tuUNWEOWJNDSSMnXj9nMWtRi+JhnANRECM8LQnr8DIoJWx1i12IS0DARLHsj7Nl OnrzGvdSbX5xZsZYllq3OSPtp5s3yiQsjAK89ZC+GuKU6OVRTpl5sM/LYKeHsyVpx6jUUqtslXQPy gyBoQoM1o6SYPpgKFwv0jVIHRO68BU2dnxadhanHjP56nvll20f9USvUZIeZ6XEX+7xXw+fJkSrEY juDxmdLi6cPLcIHnVwr8E2WaPNvVH5NuV7c54eHrQGiggtF4Gu/Emk3r+cF8EUgtveJeuZxQLNA7D WAaR1nROEMQEBd7zkBrw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s9914-0000000FOrS-3Skt; Mon, 20 May 2024 19:49:50 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([145.40.73.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s9910-0000000FOr4-0ryI for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 May 2024 19:49:47 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54794CE0B5E; Mon, 20 May 2024 19:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CB53C2BD10; Mon, 20 May 2024 19:49:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1716234583; bh=sxGLsR90KSF7S/Z2DpAE5FYChE2YFZRSsoBsCOYL/jQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LokIiB5cDH+jczaMcXHV9n9aGU9hsuiS5ZCmmORHHX7LpVIA9pTpyxJFYadpst+ov jQtiJclC0PLGotuHkrM4D0+xd+pfg6RZZU40vSSbh17BUhJXeoHpYScXa2Fs0EagWw FXkueSw0JGnvcDPyVlmIvyZmJLTk0bMhMYC3WuloQ6m4af5jasnNdDU0xwz5kyVQlm 1cCJyrQ8PGZIDhjBQDzKpRuikbIowuooKYcpCW+DoNOxiYA4Vsm0FMip4mk2d7JGKf 9t2hE/w1mhW+bypcMJ43PGzWB15qQNLniui7JfBCVidjebVlLCYQrD0IT+G9EvwxsO qLeuiIdz6h9NA== Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 14:49:42 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com, imx@lists.linux.dev, aisheng.dong@nxp.com, Peng Fan Subject: Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add properties for i.MX95 Pinctrl OEM extensions Message-ID: <20240520194942.GA1374705-robh@kernel.org> References: <20240516073012.1699795-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240516073012.1699795-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240520_124946_556880_B9DC685A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.58 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:30:12PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > From: Peng Fan > > i.MX95 Pinctrl is managed by System Control Management Interface(SCMI) > firmware using OEM extensions. No functions, no groups are provided by > the firmware. So add i.MX95 specific properties. > > To keep aligned with current i.MX pinctrl bindings, still use "fsl,pins" > for i.MX95. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan > --- > > V1: > There is already a v6 version for i.MX95 pinctrl with binding got reviewed by > Rob, https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240513-pinctrl-scmi-oem-v3-v6-1-904975c99cc4@nxp.com/ > But after NXP internal discussion, to keep "fsl,pins" for i.MX95 would make > it aligned with current i.MX93/8M/7 bindings which people are familiar with, > and easy to understand. > > Sorry to bring back so late after your reviewing in previous generic binding > patch. This is not to reject the v6 patch, just wanna to see whether you are > happy with "fsl,pins" for i.MX95. If people are happy to accept, I will post > out driver together with this patch in new patchset to reject v6. If people are > not happy, we could continue with v6. It is fine for me. Rob _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel