From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95666C25B75 for ; Wed, 29 May 2024 15:09:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=b1h8i2PovQIE+2sCbX8jWU456+Uc7PrY5VUGb1u5KRM=; b=IrCLNrte/CE7yN 4X29ykLYeL48Br5nKaglkfrA7azYzZOXm8esZaYe3RQdDbRxXxBcx+361+W1q+jsvMUdbx+LMVIPW k53v4eekE8aDMKcIxnIpwQOim13qrJNxt8G56zMAAv1wXQ0eDORmKNilvTji1MKKRrzh9jOW7UeQ/ DbLUt0NeqGkq0A9A2ZN2bXJ3hJQiZ22ywKHfZEF3tZP/hyaY0bEn95Q8nXR5RkVWrWQjBJI0iVeuw zjacrWlqtCNpz7Euo9bsFH5T6AfhbDq+0Hiva8EjolIRNyMkxAZLvtk47+wXE7OcCw99x/ErCSJsC kZYuFE++Z86wGsWH1kBw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sCKvU-00000004dNa-0JrA; Wed, 29 May 2024 15:09:16 +0000 Received: from mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com ([205.220.168.131]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sCKvQ-00000004dMh-2oZt for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 29 May 2024 15:09:14 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0279864.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 44TBtabU021170; Wed, 29 May 2024 15:09:03 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to; s=qcppdkim1; bh=owCWHyok5RQxLdu/CPu4P8FF 4Lb1VB7+ZRXHc1JgNB8=; b=lHOcXiUIFYq+7o7LX7m8c9WsSCx1mx48TDUcVZWf TPhARGnopuoQXUrj28nmdv45O7lRalQKej6nULa3/RICoeu9hEajjXaJHbUhTaYk zaXcM/VaepLISawmzfP64yXe6pgSnhyfJnjqh6AwkjPtJKSd2UkD2I5ePrNXFW7c Xzax3Ye9FTj3lDRt6EfXKfiuxnh5C5v8IGCvGXk34ys62F66rEEFMZzs/q5iwg5F xwA7v7966TP4RJTtk4IXISMFw2YCNbnLjwBmH1t20pDQbR5/ZmcxQNxnrJuFSsCI JrcIgkUcx6vSlTMmvpbwv0xP4wVHRNHS7Gu0cZWytIL7nA== Received: from nasanppmta05.qualcomm.com (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3yba0ps682-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 May 2024 15:09:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com [10.46.141.250]) by NASANPPMTA05.qualcomm.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTPS id 44TF92ca026153 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 May 2024 15:09:02 GMT Received: from hu-eberman-lv.qualcomm.com (10.49.16.6) by nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.141.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.9; Wed, 29 May 2024 08:09:01 -0700 Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 08:09:01 -0700 From: Elliot Berman To: Conor Dooley CC: Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Amrit Anand , "Peter Griffin" , Caleb Connolly , Andy Gross , Doug Anderson , Simon Glass , Chen-Yu Tsai , Julius Werner , "Humphreys, Jonathan" , Sumit Garg , "Jon Hunter" , Michal Simek , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 5/9] dt-bindings: board: Document board-ids for Qualcomm devices Message-ID: <20240526115810183-0700.eberman@hu-eberman-lv.qualcomm.com> References: <20240521-board-ids-v3-0-e6c71d05f4d2@quicinc.com> <20240521-board-ids-v3-5-e6c71d05f4d2@quicinc.com> <20240525-parachute-plutonium-ef8d1472ff50@spud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240525-parachute-plutonium-ef8d1472ff50@spud> X-Originating-IP: [10.49.16.6] X-ClientProxiedBy: nalasex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.197) To nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.141.250) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 0kYVmVeWY6R4bZ8uKCBfVzN1tngFO0WX X-Proofpoint-GUID: 0kYVmVeWY6R4bZ8uKCBfVzN1tngFO0WX X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.650,FMLib:17.12.28.16 definitions=2024-05-29_11,2024-05-28_01,2024-05-17_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2405170001 definitions=main-2405290104 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240529_080912_833929_160E4227 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 06:08:46PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 11:38:02AM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote: > > + > > +allOf: > > + # either describe soc or soc-version; it's confusing to have both > > Why not just use the one that has the most information and discard the > others? If your dtb picker for this platform doesn't care about the soc > version, then just don't look at that cell? The dtb picker for the platform doesn't know whether to care about the SoC version/platform version/whatever. That's a property of the DTB itself and I don't think it makes much sense to bake that into the DTB picker which would otherwise be unaware of this. > > Likewise for platform and PMIC, why can't you ignore the cells you don't > care about, rather than having a new property for each variant? Nothing > in this patch explains why multiple variants are required rather than > just dealing with the most informational. > Sure, I will explain in future revision. - Elliot _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel