linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<loongarch@lists.linux.dev>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	<justin.he@arm.com>, <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 19/19] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 14:34:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240529133446.28446-20-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240529133446.28446-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>

The 'offline' file in sysfs shows all offline CPUs, including those
that aren't present. User-space is expected to remove not-present CPUs
from this list to learn which CPUs could be brought online.

CPUs can be present but not-enabled. These CPUs can't be brought online
until the firmware policy changes, which comes with an ACPI notification
that will register the CPUs.

With only the offline and present files, user-space is unable to
determine which CPUs it can try to bring online. Add a new CPU mask
that shows this based on all the registered CPUs.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
 .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu      |  6 +++++
 drivers/base/cpu.c                            | 10 ++++++++
 include/linux/cpumask.h                       | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/cpu.c                                  |  3 +++
 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
index e7e160954e79..53ed1a803422 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
@@ -694,3 +694,9 @@ Description:
 		(RO) indicates whether or not the kernel directly supports
 		modifying the crash elfcorehdr for CPU hot un/plug and/or
 		on/offline changes.
+
+What:		/sys/devices/system/cpu/enabled
+Date:		Nov 2022
+Contact:	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
+Description:
+		(RO) the list of CPUs that can be brought online.
diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
index 1487cd9761a4..b57326fd48d4 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ void unregister_cpu(struct cpu *cpu)
 {
 	int logical_cpu = cpu->dev.id;
 
+	set_cpu_enabled(logical_cpu, false);
 	unregister_cpu_under_node(logical_cpu, cpu_to_node(logical_cpu));
 
 	device_unregister(&cpu->dev);
@@ -273,6 +274,13 @@ static ssize_t print_cpus_offline(struct device *dev,
 }
 static DEVICE_ATTR(offline, 0444, print_cpus_offline, NULL);
 
+static ssize_t print_cpus_enabled(struct device *dev,
+				  struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(cpu_enabled_mask));
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR(enabled, 0444, print_cpus_enabled, NULL);
+
 static ssize_t print_cpus_isolated(struct device *dev,
 				  struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
@@ -413,6 +421,7 @@ int register_cpu(struct cpu *cpu, int num)
 	register_cpu_under_node(num, cpu_to_node(num));
 	dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit(&cpu->dev,
 					PM_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY_NO_CONSTRAINT);
+	set_cpu_enabled(num, true);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -494,6 +503,7 @@ static struct attribute *cpu_root_attrs[] = {
 	&cpu_attrs[2].attr.attr,
 	&dev_attr_kernel_max.attr,
 	&dev_attr_offline.attr,
+	&dev_attr_enabled.attr,
 	&dev_attr_isolated.attr,
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
 	&dev_attr_nohz_full.attr,
diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index 23686bed441d..954d4adc8f81 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ static inline void set_nr_cpu_ids(unsigned int nr)
  *
  *     cpu_possible_mask- has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu is populatable
  *     cpu_present_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu is populated
+ *     cpu_enabled_mask  - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu can be brought online
  *     cpu_online_mask  - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu available to scheduler
  *     cpu_active_mask  - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu available to migration
  *
@@ -125,11 +126,13 @@ static inline void set_nr_cpu_ids(unsigned int nr)
 
 extern struct cpumask __cpu_possible_mask;
 extern struct cpumask __cpu_online_mask;
+extern struct cpumask __cpu_enabled_mask;
 extern struct cpumask __cpu_present_mask;
 extern struct cpumask __cpu_active_mask;
 extern struct cpumask __cpu_dying_mask;
 #define cpu_possible_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)
 #define cpu_online_mask   ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_online_mask)
+#define cpu_enabled_mask   ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_enabled_mask)
 #define cpu_present_mask  ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_present_mask)
 #define cpu_active_mask   ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_active_mask)
 #define cpu_dying_mask    ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_dying_mask)
@@ -1075,6 +1078,7 @@ extern const DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_all_bits, NR_CPUS);
 #else
 #define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask)
 #define for_each_online_cpu(cpu)   for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask)
+#define for_each_enabled_cpu(cpu)   for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_enabled_mask)
 #define for_each_present_cpu(cpu)  for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_present_mask)
 #endif
 
@@ -1092,6 +1096,15 @@ set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible)
 		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_possible_mask);
 }
 
+static inline void
+set_cpu_enabled(unsigned int cpu, bool can_be_onlined)
+{
+	if (can_be_onlined)
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_enabled_mask);
+	else
+		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_enabled_mask);
+}
+
 static inline void
 set_cpu_present(unsigned int cpu, bool present)
 {
@@ -1173,6 +1186,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int num_online_cpus(void)
 	return raw_atomic_read(&__num_online_cpus);
 }
 #define num_possible_cpus()	cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask)
+#define num_enabled_cpus()	cpumask_weight(cpu_enabled_mask)
 #define num_present_cpus()	cpumask_weight(cpu_present_mask)
 #define num_active_cpus()	cpumask_weight(cpu_active_mask)
 
@@ -1181,6 +1195,11 @@ static inline bool cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
 	return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask);
 }
 
+static inline bool cpu_enabled(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_enabled_mask);
+}
+
 static inline bool cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
@@ -1205,6 +1224,7 @@ static inline bool cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
 
 #define num_online_cpus()	1U
 #define num_possible_cpus()	1U
+#define num_enabled_cpus()	1U
 #define num_present_cpus()	1U
 #define num_active_cpus()	1U
 
@@ -1218,6 +1238,11 @@ static inline bool cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu)
 	return cpu == 0;
 }
 
+static inline bool cpu_enabled(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	return cpu == 0;
+}
+
 static inline bool cpu_present(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	return cpu == 0;
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 563877d6c28b..a2f3ad276814 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -3069,6 +3069,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_possible_mask);
 struct cpumask __cpu_online_mask __read_mostly;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_online_mask);
 
+struct cpumask __cpu_enabled_mask __read_mostly;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_enabled_mask);
+
 struct cpumask __cpu_present_mask __read_mostly;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_present_mask);
 
-- 
2.39.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-29 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-29 13:34 [PATCH v10 00/19] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 01/19] ACPI: processor: Simplify initial onlining to use same path for cold and hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 02/19] cpu: Do not warn on arch_register_cpu() returning -EPROBE_DEFER Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 03/19] ACPI: processor: Drop duplicated check on _STA (enabled + present) Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 04/19] ACPI: processor: Return an error if acpi_processor_get_info() fails in processor_add() Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 05/19] ACPI: processor: Fix memory leaks in error paths of processor_add() Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 06/19] ACPI: processor: Move checks and availability of acpi_processor earlier Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 07/19] ACPI: processor: Add acpi_get_processor_handle() helper Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 08/19] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 09/19] ACPI: scan: switch to flags for acpi_scan_check_and_detach() Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 10/19] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 11/19] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 12/19] arm64: acpi: Harden get_cpu_for_acpi_id() against missing CPU entry Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 13/19] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-19  8:11   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 14/19] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-19 12:10   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 15/19] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 16/19] arm64: arch_register_cpu() variant to check if an ACPI handle is now available Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 17/19] arm64: Kconfig: Enable hotplug CPU on arm64 if ACPI_PROCESSOR is enabled Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-30  0:39   ` Gavin Shan
2024-06-30  9:26     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-01  0:17       ` Gavin Shan
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 18/19] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-30 12:53   ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-10  8:23     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-06-13 10:25 ` [PATCH v10 00/19] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-19 12:11   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-06-28 14:49     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-28 17:56 ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240529133446.28446-20-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).