linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<loongarch@lists.linux.dev>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	<justin.he@arm.com>, <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 06/19] ACPI: processor: Move checks and availability of acpi_processor earlier
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 14:34:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240529133446.28446-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240529133446.28446-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Make the per_cpu(processors, cpu) entries available earlier so that
they are available in arch_register_cpu() as ARM64 will need access
to the acpi_handle to distinguish between acpi_processor_add()
and earlier registration attempts (which will fail as _STA cannot
be checked).

Reorder the remove flow to clear this per_cpu() after
arch_unregister_cpu() has completed, allowing it to be used in
there as well.

Note that on x86 for the CPU hotplug case, the pr->id prior to
acpi_map_cpu() may be invalid. Thus the per_cpu() structures
must be initialized after that call or after checking the ID
is valid (not hotplug path).

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

---
v10: Thanks To Rafael and Gavin for the same suggestion.
  - Make the acpi_process_set_per_cpu() function return an int
    (-EINVAL or 0 as appropriate), simplifying how it is used.
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 16e36e55a560..0bc0419adf6b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -183,8 +183,38 @@ static void __init acpi_pcc_cpufreq_init(void) {}
 #endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
 
 /* Initialization */
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array);
+
+static int acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(struct acpi_processor *pr,
+				      struct acpi_device *device)
+{
+	BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids);
+
+	/*
+	 * Buggy BIOS check.
+	 * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS.
+	 * Don't trust it blindly
+	 */
+	if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL &&
+	    per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) {
+		dev_warn(&device->dev,
+			 "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n",
+			 pr->id);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	/*
+	 * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS
+	 * checks.
+	 */
+	per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device;
+	per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
-static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
+static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr,
+				      struct acpi_device *device)
 {
 	int ret;
 
@@ -198,8 +228,16 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
+	ret = acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device);
+	if (ret) {
+		acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	ret = arch_register_cpu(pr->id);
 	if (ret) {
+		/* Leave the processor device array in place to detect buggy bios */
+		per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
 		acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id);
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -217,7 +255,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 	return ret;
 }
 #else
-static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
+static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr,
+					     struct acpi_device *device)
 {
 	return -ENODEV;
 }
@@ -232,6 +271,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
 	static int cpu0_initialized;
 	unsigned long long value;
+	int ret;
 
 	acpi_processor_errata();
 
@@ -315,12 +355,12 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
 	 *  NOTE: Even if the processor has a cpuid, it may not be present
 	 *  because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now.
 	 */
-	if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) {
-		int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr);
-
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
-	}
+	if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id))
+		ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr, device);
+	else
+		ret = acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	/*
 	 * On some boxes several processors use the same processor bus id.
@@ -365,8 +405,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
  * (cpu_data(cpu)) values, like CPU feature flags, family, model, etc.
  * Such things have to be put in and set up by the processor driver's .probe().
  */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array);
-
 static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 					const struct acpi_device_id *id)
 {
@@ -395,28 +433,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 	if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */
 		goto err_clear_driver_data;
 
-	BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids);
-
-	/*
-	 * Buggy BIOS check.
-	 * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS.
-	 * Don't trust it blindly
-	 */
-	if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL &&
-	    per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) {
-		dev_warn(&device->dev,
-			"BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n",
-			pr->id);
-		/* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */
-		goto err_clear_driver_data;
-	}
-	/*
-	 * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS
-	 * checks.
-	 */
-	per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device;
-	per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr;
-
 	dev = get_cpu_device(pr->id);
 	if (!dev) {
 		result = -ENODEV;
@@ -470,10 +486,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 	device_release_driver(pr->dev);
 	acpi_unbind_one(pr->dev);
 
-	/* Clean up. */
-	per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL;
-	per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
-
 	cpu_maps_update_begin();
 	cpus_write_lock();
 
@@ -481,6 +493,10 @@ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 	arch_unregister_cpu(pr->id);
 	acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id);
 
+	/* Clean up. */
+	per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL;
+	per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
+
 	cpus_write_unlock();
 	cpu_maps_update_done();
 
-- 
2.39.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-29 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-29 13:34 [PATCH v10 00/19] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 01/19] ACPI: processor: Simplify initial onlining to use same path for cold and hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 02/19] cpu: Do not warn on arch_register_cpu() returning -EPROBE_DEFER Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 03/19] ACPI: processor: Drop duplicated check on _STA (enabled + present) Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 04/19] ACPI: processor: Return an error if acpi_processor_get_info() fails in processor_add() Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 05/19] ACPI: processor: Fix memory leaks in error paths of processor_add() Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 07/19] ACPI: processor: Add acpi_get_processor_handle() helper Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 08/19] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 09/19] ACPI: scan: switch to flags for acpi_scan_check_and_detach() Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 10/19] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 11/19] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 12/19] arm64: acpi: Harden get_cpu_for_acpi_id() against missing CPU entry Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 13/19] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-19  8:11   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 14/19] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-19 12:10   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 15/19] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 16/19] arm64: arch_register_cpu() variant to check if an ACPI handle is now available Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 17/19] arm64: Kconfig: Enable hotplug CPU on arm64 if ACPI_PROCESSOR is enabled Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-30  0:39   ` Gavin Shan
2024-06-30  9:26     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-01  0:17       ` Gavin Shan
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 18/19] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-30 12:53   ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-10  8:23     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 13:34 ` [PATCH v10 19/19] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-13 10:25 ` [PATCH v10 00/19] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-19 12:11   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-06-28 14:49     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-28 17:56 ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240529133446.28446-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).