From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0D4FC25B74 for ; Thu, 30 May 2024 17:28:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References: List-Owner; bh=gHj3NGo+n1+Sa6Md7NQN+kEuOeq2SbZ0kwUV6o36eoQ=; b=ENVmgVAUZn6/vo C9kRe1JqoSZp03+cFc5oCGjKO8ucp5/Ae4scg1jqR/hnEEwTFTrS5EvMUvTq45WBEM/Ps+dE6X5B5 ++WRhK2gIhfsl9DGxs7LC35aEuAIyDs5quRzksZ6uWoii+2aMgCbpBUa8vIpAvLNU/tURpFN0iQzE X32v1oC/X0mvUZbXn12NtbVdlydlEEmbpJ2u4XrQIa0fhn7N96nrbNPMeIVdL2wIf77LULmr+glH7 ymTUQZ5Q3DScitjHGgk4F1Wqk3zB6tYxhI+icZaZL+Y9ZJV4TahtwDmdR2U1SRIyJpHomQIVHj9v4 zwvbFO/SOCmcfnTl44Ng==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sCjZE-00000007zYj-2dXs; Thu, 30 May 2024 17:27:56 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sCjZB-00000007zYJ-1VrS for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 30 May 2024 17:27:54 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFF96284F; Thu, 30 May 2024 17:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AACBC2BBFC; Thu, 30 May 2024 17:27:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1717090071; bh=EkqPzNjUDQoN8lPfXqwKVpp8+X0/wVz+5NkoJWj35ko=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=lLERB+W86acD27TYDzKVQXQn1QMtGGWa3wwzsNOnVvZNcpsS+eXwViREODp86cbJI rSJe96C7mr2uk7xEx2WcAWaFri7i5u7e/PgmXIaWd19TSaJf9xcagmzCgg4hwS09kq hxySEa23v54kQxPNYOiJ7LK5ZMkwq+6ZXJTI8QFOcKQu0C4DdWnK57+kTEbnmPxQf2 P1waAtfMiozVsWzyLACVBQ6mxVU6MSbvpz1d5y8ZWCELAxxSmkovDqU95WZ8fGpq2K KWa0Ny/gIzNGzi6NoZo+xzMnoiKxHlfpNyBJ4yfnEAYP0fweLpMy2hOamY7a0KRwEB MqR2BFyNUnTxQ== Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 12:27:49 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Frank Li Cc: Richard Zhu , Lucas Stach , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Philipp Zabel , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jason Liu , Conor Dooley Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] PCI: imx6: Fix\rename\clean up and add lut information for imx95 Message-ID: <20240530172749.GA552716@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240530_102753_491391_30644C0C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.47 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:00:49AM -0400, Frank Li wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 05:31:36PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Frank Li wrote: > ... > > > Base on linux-pci/controller/imx > > > > This applies cleanly to the pci/controller/gpio branch, which has some > > minor rework in pci-imx6.c. > > > > When we apply this, I think we should do it on a a pci/controller/imx6 > > branch that is based on "main" (v6.10-rc1). > > > > I can resolve the conflicts with pci/controller/gpio when building > > pci/next. > > Sorry, I forget update this. It should be base on linux-pci/next > (e3fca37312892122d73f8c5293c0d1cc8c34500b). I prefer patches that are based on -rc1, i.e., the pci/main branch, not on the pci/next branch. If a series *requires* functionality that is already on a topic branch, you can base it on that branch instead of on pci/main. This series happens to touch some of the same code as pci/controller/gpio, but it doesn't require those gpio changes, so it does not need to be based on pci/controller/gpio. Having this series based on pci/main means that if we update or drop the gpio branch for some reason, this series will still make sense. Bjorn _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel