From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, fsverity@lists.linux.dev,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] crypto: shash - add support for finup_mb
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:25:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240604192542.GD1566@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXHVbVhydU60zzUc8a-jVkboRz1pz0TW7Sx_5N_AvdhZdA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 08:55:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > This patch takes a new approach of just adding an API
> > crypto_shash_finup_mb() that synchronously computes the hash of multiple
> > equal-length messages, starting from a common state that represents the
> > (possibly empty) common prefix shared by the messages.
> >
>
> This is an independent optimization, right? This could be useful even
> more sequential hashing, and is not a fundamental aspect of parallel
> hashing?
If you're referring to the part about using a common starting state, that's not
an independent optimization. Only multibuffer hashing processes multiple
messages in one call and therefore has an opportunity to share a starting
shash_desc for finup. This isn't just an optimization but it also makes the
multibuffer hashing API and its implementation much simpler.
With single-buffer there has to be one shash_desc per message as usual.
If you're asking if crypto_shash_finup_mb() can be used even without multibuffer
hashing support, the answer is yes. This patchset makes crypto_shash_finup_mb()
fall back to crypto_shash_finup() as needed, and this is used by fsverity and
dm-verity to have one code path that uses crypto_shash_finup_mb() instead of
separate code paths that use crypto_shash_finup_mb() and crypto_shash_finup().
This just makes things a bit simpler and isn't an optimization; note that the
fallback has to copy the shash_desc for each message beyond the first.
- Eric
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-04 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-03 18:37 [PATCH v4 0/8] Optimize dm-verity and fsverity using multibuffer hashing Eric Biggers
2024-06-03 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] crypto: shash - add support for finup_mb Eric Biggers
2024-06-04 18:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-06-04 19:25 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2024-06-03 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] crypto: testmgr - generate power-of-2 lengths more often Eric Biggers
2024-06-03 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] crypto: testmgr - add tests for finup_mb Eric Biggers
2024-06-03 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] crypto: x86/sha256-ni - add support " Eric Biggers
2024-06-03 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] crypto: arm64/sha256-ce " Eric Biggers
2024-06-04 19:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-06-03 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] fsverity: improve performance by using multibuffer hashing Eric Biggers
2024-06-04 9:37 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-04 18:42 ` Eric Biggers
2024-06-05 9:19 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-05 9:22 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-05 9:46 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-05 19:14 ` Eric Biggers
2024-06-06 2:00 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-06 5:28 ` Eric Biggers
2024-06-06 5:41 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-06 6:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-06-06 7:34 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-06 7:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-06-06 8:08 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-06 8:33 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-06-06 9:15 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-10 16:42 ` Eric Biggers
2024-06-11 15:21 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-11 15:39 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-11 20:32 ` Eric Biggers
2024-06-11 15:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-06-11 15:51 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-11 20:18 ` Eric Biggers
2024-06-05 18:58 ` Eric Biggers
2024-06-03 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] dm-verity: hash blocks with shash import+finup when possible Eric Biggers
2024-06-03 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] dm-verity: improve performance by using multibuffer hashing Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240604192542.GD1566@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).