From: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 2/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce pmu_event_filter_test
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 04:31:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240619083200.1047073-3-shahuang@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240619083200.1047073-1-shahuang@redhat.com>
Introduce pmu_event_filter_test for arm64 platforms. The test configures
PMUv3 for a vCPU, and sets different pmu event filters for the vCPU, and
check if the guest can see those events which user allow and can't use
those events which use deny.
This test refactor the create_vpmu_vm() and make it a wrapper for
__create_vpmu_vm(), which allows some extra init code before
KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT.
And this test use the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER attribute to set the
pmu event filter in KVM. And choose to filter two common event
branches_retired and instructions_retired, and let the guest to check if
it see the right pmceid register.
Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
.../kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c | 314 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 315 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index ac280dcba996..2110b49e7a84 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/aarch32_id_regs
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/debug-exceptions
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/hypercalls
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/page_fault_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/psci_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/set_id_regs
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/smccc_filter
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..308b8677e08e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
+
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * pmu_event_filter_test - Test user limit pmu event for guest.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Red Hat, Inc.
+ *
+ * This test checks if the guest only see the limited pmu event that userspace
+ * sets, if the guest can use those events which user allow, and if the guest
+ * can't use those events which user deny.
+ * This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER
+ * is supported on the host.
+ */
+#include <kvm_util.h>
+#include <processor.h>
+#include <vgic.h>
+#include <vpmu.h>
+#include <test_util.h>
+#include <perf/arm_pmuv3.h>
+
+struct pmu_common_event_ids {
+ uint64_t pmceid0;
+ uint64_t pmceid1;
+} max_pmce, expected_pmce;
+
+struct vpmu_vm {
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ int gic_fd;
+};
+
+static struct vpmu_vm vpmu_vm;
+
+#define FILTER_NR 10
+
+struct test_desc {
+ const char *name;
+ struct kvm_pmu_event_filter filter[FILTER_NR];
+};
+
+#define __DEFINE_FILTER(base, num, act) \
+ ((struct kvm_pmu_event_filter) { \
+ .base_event = base, \
+ .nevents = num, \
+ .action = act, \
+ })
+
+#define DEFINE_FILTER(base, act) __DEFINE_FILTER(base, 1, act)
+
+#define EVENT_ALLOW(event) DEFINE_FILTER(event, KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW)
+#define EVENT_DENY(event) DEFINE_FILTER(event, KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY)
+
+static void guest_code(void)
+{
+ uint64_t pmceid0 = read_sysreg(pmceid0_el0);
+ uint64_t pmceid1 = read_sysreg(pmceid1_el0);
+
+ GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(expected_pmce.pmceid0, pmceid0);
+ GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(expected_pmce.pmceid1, pmceid1);
+
+ GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+static void guest_get_pmceid(void)
+{
+ max_pmce.pmceid0 = read_sysreg(pmceid0_el0);
+ max_pmce.pmceid1 = read_sysreg(pmceid1_el0);
+
+ GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct ucall uc;
+
+ while (1) {
+ vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
+ case UCALL_DONE:
+ return;
+ case UCALL_ABORT:
+ REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT(uc);
+ break;
+ default:
+ TEST_FAIL("Unknown ucall %lu", uc.cmd);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static void set_pmce(struct pmu_common_event_ids *pmce, int action, int event)
+{
+ int base = 0;
+ uint64_t *pmceid = NULL;
+
+ if (event >= 0x4000) {
+ event -= 0x4000;
+ base = 32;
+ }
+
+ if (event >= 0 && event <= 0x1F) {
+ pmceid = &pmce->pmceid0;
+ } else if (event >= 0x20 && event <= 0x3F) {
+ event -= 0x20;
+ pmceid = &pmce->pmceid1;
+ } else {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ event += base;
+ if (action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW)
+ *pmceid |= BIT(event);
+ else
+ *pmceid &= ~BIT(event);
+}
+
+static inline bool is_valid_filter(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *filter)
+{
+ return filter && filter->nevents != 0;
+}
+
+static void prepare_expected_pmce(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *filter)
+{
+ struct pmu_common_event_ids pmce_mask = { ~0, ~0 };
+ int i;
+
+ if (is_valid_filter(filter) && filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW)
+ memset(&pmce_mask, 0, sizeof(pmce_mask));
+
+ while (is_valid_filter(filter)) {
+ for (i = 0; i < filter->nevents; i++)
+ set_pmce(&pmce_mask, filter->action,
+ filter->base_event + i);
+ filter++;
+ }
+
+ expected_pmce.pmceid0 = max_pmce.pmceid0 & pmce_mask.pmceid0;
+ expected_pmce.pmceid1 = max_pmce.pmceid1 & pmce_mask.pmceid1;
+}
+
+static void pmu_event_filter_init(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *filter)
+{
+ while (is_valid_filter(filter)) {
+ kvm_device_attr_set(vpmu_vm.vcpu->fd,
+ KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
+ KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER,
+ filter);
+ filter++;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Create a VM that has one vCPU with PMUv3 configured. */
+static void create_vpmu_vm_with_filter(void *guest_code,
+ struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *filter)
+{
+ uint64_t irq = 23;
+
+ /* The test creates the vpmu_vm multiple times. Ensure a clean state */
+ memset(&vpmu_vm, 0, sizeof(vpmu_vm));
+
+ vpmu_vm.vm = vm_create(1);
+ vpmu_vm.vcpu = vm_vcpu_add_with_vpmu(vpmu_vm.vm, 0, guest_code);
+ vpmu_vm.gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vpmu_vm.vm, 1, 64);
+ __TEST_REQUIRE(vpmu_vm.gic_fd >= 0,
+ "Failed to create vgic-v3, skipping");
+
+ pmu_event_filter_init(filter);
+
+ /* Initialize vPMU */
+ vpmu_set_irq(vpmu_vm.vcpu, irq);
+ vpmu_init(vpmu_vm.vcpu);
+}
+
+static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code)
+{
+ create_vpmu_vm_with_filter(guest_code, NULL);
+}
+
+static void destroy_vpmu_vm(void)
+{
+ close(vpmu_vm.gic_fd);
+ kvm_vm_free(vpmu_vm.vm);
+}
+
+static void run_test(struct test_desc *t)
+{
+ pr_info("Test: %s\n", t->name);
+
+ create_vpmu_vm_with_filter(guest_code, t->filter);
+ prepare_expected_pmce(t->filter);
+ sync_global_to_guest(vpmu_vm.vm, expected_pmce);
+
+ run_vcpu(vpmu_vm.vcpu);
+
+ destroy_vpmu_vm();
+}
+
+static struct test_desc tests[] = {
+ {
+ .name = "without_filter",
+ .filter = {
+ { 0 }
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "member_allow_filter",
+ .filter = {
+ EVENT_ALLOW(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_SW_INCR),
+ EVENT_ALLOW(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_INST_RETIRED),
+ EVENT_ALLOW(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_BR_RETIRED),
+ { 0 },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "member_deny_filter",
+ .filter = {
+ EVENT_DENY(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_SW_INCR),
+ EVENT_DENY(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_INST_RETIRED),
+ EVENT_DENY(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_BR_RETIRED),
+ { 0 },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "not_member_deny_filter",
+ .filter = {
+ EVENT_DENY(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_SW_INCR),
+ { 0 },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "not_member_allow_filter",
+ .filter = {
+ EVENT_ALLOW(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_SW_INCR),
+ { 0 },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "deny_chain_filter",
+ .filter = {
+ EVENT_DENY(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CHAIN),
+ { 0 },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "deny_cpu_cycles_filter",
+ .filter = {
+ EVENT_DENY(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES),
+ { 0 },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "cancel_allow_filter",
+ .filter = {
+ EVENT_ALLOW(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES),
+ EVENT_DENY(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES),
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "cancel_deny_filter",
+ .filter = {
+ EVENT_DENY(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES),
+ EVENT_ALLOW(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES),
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "multiple_filter",
+ .filter = {
+ __DEFINE_FILTER(0x0, 0x10, KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW),
+ __DEFINE_FILTER(0x6, 0x3, KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY),
+ },
+ },
+ { 0 }
+};
+
+static void run_tests(void)
+{
+ struct test_desc *t;
+
+ for (t = &tests[0]; t->name; t++)
+ run_test(t);
+}
+
+static int used_pmu_events[] = {
+ ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_BR_RETIRED,
+ ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_INST_RETIRED,
+ ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CHAIN,
+ ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES,
+};
+
+static bool kvm_pmu_support_events(void)
+{
+ struct pmu_common_event_ids used_pmce = { 0, 0 };
+
+ create_vpmu_vm(guest_get_pmceid);
+
+ memset(&max_pmce, 0, sizeof(max_pmce));
+ sync_global_to_guest(vpmu_vm.vm, max_pmce);
+ run_vcpu(vpmu_vm.vcpu);
+ sync_global_from_guest(vpmu_vm.vm, max_pmce);
+ destroy_vpmu_vm();
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(used_pmu_events); i++)
+ set_pmce(&used_pmce, KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW, used_pmu_events[i]);
+
+ return ((max_pmce.pmceid0 & used_pmce.pmceid0) == used_pmce.pmceid0) &&
+ ((max_pmce.pmceid1 & used_pmce.pmceid1) == used_pmce.pmceid1);
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3));
+ TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_pmu_support_events());
+
+ run_tests();
+}
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-19 8:31 [PATCH v10 0/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce pmu_event_filter_test Shaoqin Huang
2024-06-19 8:31 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add helper function for the vpmu vcpu creation Shaoqin Huang
2024-06-20 22:30 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2024-06-19 8:31 ` Shaoqin Huang [this message]
2024-06-20 22:26 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce pmu_event_filter_test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2024-06-19 8:31 ` [PATCH v10 3/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add invalid filter test in pmu_event_filter_test Shaoqin Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240619083200.1047073-3-shahuang@redhat.com \
--to=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).