From: "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>
To: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
"Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arm@kernel.org,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/armada-370-xp: Use atomic_io_modify() instead of another spinlock
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:52:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240620095233.12185-1-kabel@kernel.org> (raw)
Use the dedicated atomic_io_modify() instead of hardcoded
spin_lock() + readl() + writel() + spin_unlock() sequence.
This allows us to drop the irq_controller_lock spinlock from the driver.
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org>
---
Note: the atomic_io_modify() function is defined only for arm platform,
and it is currently used only in 3 drivers:
drivers/clocksource/timer-armada-370-xp.c
drivers/clocksource/timer-orion.c
drivers/watchdog/orion_wdt.c
Do we want to use this? Is there some other standardized alternative
that can be used across all platforms?
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c | 12 +++---------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c
index 924a574f28ea..8d76e70f8dfd 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c
@@ -512,24 +512,18 @@ static __init void armada_xp_ipi_init(struct device_node *node)
set_smp_ipi_range(base_ipi, IPI_DOORBELL_END);
}
-static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(irq_controller_lock);
-
static int armada_xp_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
const struct cpumask *mask_val, bool force)
{
irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
- unsigned long reg, mask;
int cpu;
/* Select a single core from the affinity mask which is online */
cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
- mask = 1UL << cpu_logical_map(cpu);
- raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
- reg = readl(main_int_base + ARMADA_370_XP_INT_SOURCE_CTL(hwirq));
- reg = (reg & (~ARMADA_370_XP_INT_SOURCE_CPU_MASK)) | mask;
- writel(reg, main_int_base + ARMADA_370_XP_INT_SOURCE_CTL(hwirq));
- raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
+ atomic_io_modify(main_int_base + ARMADA_370_XP_INT_SOURCE_CTL(hwirq),
+ ARMADA_370_XP_INT_SOURCE_CPU_MASK,
+ BIT(cpu_logical_map(cpu)));
irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
--
2.44.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-20 9:52 Marek Behún [this message]
2024-06-20 14:25 ` [PATCH] irqchip/armada-370-xp: Use atomic_io_modify() instead of another spinlock Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240620095233.12185-1-kabel@kernel.org \
--to=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).