From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59219C27C4F for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 06:16:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=/4tKbbahUGVgGhYh3rBq3A+r4pqyA+buPU1/3MvqwEE=; b=wnGayOmkvj0FgaT4ElNaP82B1m Ca7epI/VYaun61GRdwMH5lPaNjIwC3z9sImBHMC9nj6dLEt/QrQUFeiYB+WjEtWAaZTvGf1U8knfM A8S8uHO5uCwmKgnkJfEeEvM2EIW8Zh2MWGt42s3ziZCa/hr9lJeZk25TGE0ShhOagmTOX6QpHiVip b7s8XJrVP5NJ1kNd4VJR5LLO3H7ZgBdKfbmg9p/KoJgmHgZKAkVf/LdQxM0gnBCs1DuxFTvea9cFF pM8P6H1tFJYV/1f8lXvkX+7sGUHlKWXuMZTtgDYpUtoUu8pMxBXbFW9/vigmXBlWLNDb8cRe4hc70 e4evBoNQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sLGWW-0000000DR5m-3Jg6; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 06:16:24 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sLGWR-0000000DR54-1swi for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 06:16:21 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B1760DC7; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 06:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7174C2BD10; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 06:16:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1719123377; bh=6GMiZdluTgdZf10SBwq86OdctxPd0I67Qo3uoQ8hXhw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=V3LTrF8S/4D9rVU1oM29aoRQpL5NVg+vi/LeoZatbGiuwffPbzb/1BAccKXpDd8sY V6tvY9d9ceO5Uwm5ENzZ7CONpPK4IfgA/Wo2jkP8lOiR/lDxtec/Ie19fhnPsIh+Vt wAl3NWeA99+eFszcC94cTIXpjGHM7KROsTqDzeVM= Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 08:16:20 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Markus Elfring Cc: Ma Ke , linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Jeffery , Joel Stanley , Neal Liu , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for ast udc Message-ID: <2024062313-automated-theology-3f62@gregkh> References: <20240622095618.1890093-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240622_231619_658129_628DF9AC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.91 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 05:24:25PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host > > may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array. > > * Can an imperative wording be more desirable for such a change description? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc4#n94 > > * Will any tags (like “Fixes”) become relevant here? Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot