From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92C58C2BBCA for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:30:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=15UTpn1qSRXaUZANIUJVqlyxYcy+2Ig/wO6Q4yLX3eg=; b=Iiql8HaKaq6cXWM1h+YoNK5g4E oknIV7/tLpilZW9AQi+UpmFuXem9HNpJB8B+2LpuU/Tq2bWu3y6mn+zXViBLlS06+UdrSYqdrmzOe daETGF/Cp/JllI9R32i3KrS3quQztUAJK9LFu3o0L95yNSl/EBKcplDz2MLtXzHDVe1f4MTRk/c55 /RRkpiGs6UjSNwNjPrMOiFe2/imgS4GfPDCfJ/OEoIGwkePSloTYFtX1hLcF1wUNn24yoMCKDvsqg wwdJQ8enKlRBNhn3bu3hYXocIsAY0nSBojbcfDdAGVFg35t9Kizb+GcyXgtCnXeB07+CRIhcviq6w FKu0t9vw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sM5JC-00000002lsl-2wUj; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:30:03 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sM5J6-00000002lrQ-3a6G for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:29:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F0F61408; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:29:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F157BC32781; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:29:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1719318595; bh=IA6jC8XTItCVnYkwZOTQ5t8CtJcSSO5iYQC//SFjUCc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XWw8bD6G9VvIqpoQ5PeHaZVwh5pvOLzT+Xx+vPOZYL0NDfgfX6E/gACdNZYvDni6H /DSRtmt6r5gyodtdQ0DBoxgihdXisNS7NtLRYZI2FgMrbAKOMTbEHuUVSZoY3Yuv/W fzJskr3corZdMowUMwpmuaFJDXHRmkVIhQu1FX7w= Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:29:52 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Markus Elfring Cc: Ma Ke , linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Jeffery , Joel Stanley , Neal Liu , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for ast udc Message-ID: <2024062541-disdain-essay-7434@gregkh> References: <20240625022306.2568122-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240625_052956_977714_D50C6518 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.27 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 02:00:15PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host > > may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array. > > Why did you not choose an imperative wording for your change description? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc5#n94 > > > > Found by static analysis. > > Were any special tools involved? > > > How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly? Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot