From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C760BC27C4F for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:53:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=X82V2P8TKJ6I8usLvjtNSyZFMJxGfnoq2XWLZLGMyXM=; b=gRmjn1NuVxZhaTBNNlQwAVL1yS XcfpUAQK/IkmjgzYEY61FtKG5Kg6UYEYlexosgfB1IqRVWckLE69Ky2iAneJG20USifnDWocTlaMp mQCk1qhrTFXzMHr2R/Q2Cq0tEin9elo0UhFqFLjFOzcBLFqzg+pesCqKvISQgxOwMGyxdhb3mvvUJ wupAXnizjG4RZikEDvD4E+MJ00yxUkl7qkNCc1rpDF37Nl/oKsTyzX3qKwOVniDmz44JztHd5ym/g jjA64ICg/xDLHamHFwYh92fgqSkNdKYz2K+Ctg1N5pI1Syme8Mi3OrDEGMLQUMGKGRFwb5Ko2Ht6G ewSWfbBw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sMMWS-00000005efT-0Sv3; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:52:52 +0000 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sMMWL-00000005ee3-03kj for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:52:46 +0000 Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0524D24000B; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:52:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1719384761; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X82V2P8TKJ6I8usLvjtNSyZFMJxGfnoq2XWLZLGMyXM=; b=kkRAU5YeXHUASh1bGiT5FERp3Mx6h6xd8Tc4Mx4MSS7GL7twUqycQ10OUYsbXOI5iLVt2A oUsne71Ia20lVvneuq9SgEBi3IBQvU7IWePE6zj9CMk4dCBtiQK4Wi38sSqQjRipBddKzG JqFr/hWpMgWo+wxNU8LPTdvd1dro/7ifG2q2RuHbmAj6D1GvdAfqX0lSWd1RxR//WUmB6z AZw0F1y+N3yYzZ79Sss3rr1Bnv4vrLQ9ygC9J9f6CAxWDIwuyuUtTWVKlBOVPkgBPNSBgO XsarOwoOA/v6b6o0GHf/SOJx8GhrAVHHHhpvJU5glbWkJsLYhW0sqRnd3B5Bng== Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:52:36 +0200 From: Herve Codina To: Steen Hegelund Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Andy Shevchenko , Simon Horman , Sai Krishna Gajula , Thomas Gleixner , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Lee Jones , Arnd Bergmann , Horatiu Vultur , , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , Saravana Kannan , "Bjorn Helgaas" , Philipp Zabel , "Lars Povlsen" , Daniel Machon , Alexandre Belloni , , , , , , "Allan Nielsen" , Luca Ceresoli , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/19] mfd: Add support for LAN966x PCI device Message-ID: <20240626085236.62e61723@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20240621184923.GA1398370@bhelgaas> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-GND-Sasl: herve.codina@bootlin.com X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240625_235245_346968_E97EF669 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.28 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Steen, Bjorn, Andy, On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 13:46:32 +0200 Steen Hegelund wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > I am not sure what went wrong here. > > I have seen that lspci lists 'Microchip / SMSC' for the 0x1055 Vendor > ID value and as mentioned previously there has been a number of > aquicisions over the years, so that the ID has been absorbed but not > necessarily re-registered. > > Anyway I have started an investigation, so we can determine what > up/down in this. > > I agree that for now this will have to be PCI_VENDOR_ID_EFAR, and I > will return with an update as soon as I know more. > Right, PCI_VENDOR_ID_EFAR will be directly used in the next iteration. Best regards, Hervé