From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C2A1C27C4F for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:14:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=jeCcMjqv3X536DC3CvnqrOoKOTSknb/dg3SEgp9Qysk=; b=0chbVpesycIRR9ZZlsas8nPhZf 6YOjV3cDF2NOFuedx3QFVjSt3UVwtHtR/2WjK+K2kVJlnm0Q4BPr9JTRdla08ytLzpHrPjXyFygZa 6pUAAsHdAg65GBacKQMHsrFuuGV/gsq+j48csSTOskl9sd7gP+Yd/9ADOYl+URs7pEqLxU0vy1Fos 8EXBjTw5+dikY9cO+h9i6xzXfFQIMG4GCe4jGFR4qbsyxiGnqNAT/aRzrEE2OGICgFNZUT7OQ8Wu5 4+JJfWralPspr+1w2TsGnE4vAU6V9QMt/1iZ8pT5sT8MFQnk3+jMjG1u6hnXMj7SElcoj8uGejEZl bx7n1fFQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sMULO-00000007LjE-04HJ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:13:58 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sMULG-00000007Lhn-0IJz for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:13:51 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD04561A55; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44B2DC116B1; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:13:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1719414828; bh=nyFfYXcb8BHeCVoCZIVl/CHDqWGfVZeZvhuIHlrHsVA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=E5BGYU+IwcgJQ6wzQoc8q3zuJLZ9s2znsJkN2Qr3X9/Cb0eNV3SpZM/USpdlJTQGu 8EqcZZWEuuEJc2FsvqCE1RgDsYSM+cwsgs/uZfnEI1gW/KGo8jFhnrE7uvEi1anaWN DOgC9lo1TVq9C0LFW9qDF7ojk8D976NnIwkvCIkNRae6M+r2L9tsbjJAVbfOaw1fzf +BWWGHS4tBiAfL1AZHAXAfcMBVYNtK5d/XPhdUhU4geWcsA77NyEYIDdIFzGbl9wLH AM55/hnVqLmm5rODA8gHNA5zBwsQMwEgzEnkCxG7rWyJMj9oTkJi229m1e50GwOahp qvo9Bl3kHrBOw== Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:13:43 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Fabrice Gasnier , William Breathitt Gray , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thorsten Scherer Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: stm32-timers: Make register definition more flexible Message-ID: <20240626151343.GA2504017@google.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240626_081350_199589_33472A35 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.69 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 19 Jun 2024, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > (implicit) v1 is available at > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1718352022.git.u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com > . > > Changes introduced here: > > - Split the patch removing TIM_DIER_CC_IE() and use appropriate subject > prefixes. Lee and William didn't like the patch touching both > include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h and > drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.c not having a hint to the counter > subsystem (at least that's my interpretation of their feedback). > Not mentioning mfd didn't seem to be considerably better in my eyes, > so I split this patch. > - Fix typo noticed by Thorsten. > - Update subject prefix of the last patch to match what is usually done > for pwm. > > I have some further updates to the pwm-stm32 driver that will probably > go in before v6.10-rc1. They shouldn't conflict, still I'd prefer to let > the pwm patch go in via my tree as I might have some further changes for > that driver. So if this is merged using the mfd or counter tree, please > skip the pwm patch. A stable branch would be welcome in this case. > > Best regards > Uwe > > > Uwe Kleine-König (5): > mfd: stm32-timers: Unify alignment of register definition > mfd: stm32-timers: Add some register definitions with a parameter > counter: stm32-timer-cnt: Use TIM_DIER_CCxIE(x) instead of > TIM_DIER_CCxIE(x) > mfd: stm32-timers: Drop unused TIM_DIER_CC_IE > pwm: stm32: Make use of parametrised register definitions > > drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.c | 4 +- > drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 22 ++-- > include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h | 179 ++++++++++++++++-------------- > 3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-) > > base-commit: 1613e604df0cd359cf2a7fbd9be7a0bcfacfabd0 Applied patches 1-4 and submitted for build testing. If all is good, I'll sent out a PR for William. Note to self: ib-mfd-counter-5.11 -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]