From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61D9CC30658 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:49:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:CC:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=FG0G0ywNmuoxGpyq6lQrOHOD4upQGSCNQx44X3Vmrpo=; b=cbe9d9nXGqJ4eQvW6aJ9iAu7GZ 4Gyh4iffeNFvXAUb925pNwuDgbBPV2Hfbw58nVdW7PO8REJyGQkoX6pUt8ewoUkCExjR7OKYseuTX sLwgl0fHXSJnJAh/efVVyqEICLDGuc88dBJXi7yqH6Sh308ZjszI7qyzpHCvNe8sn5S0g648dIldm Dtc14BYliE4KNupd7qHkFL8RlaS2M2B8XmMXGLf0HrFHuoEo/nUl7F/8aYcVUrHfB2vKpZFDtWvhW 4+FuCUhW1rSShhjwaOKhr4a52z7x7HIGSKD7BEKXEbeF2UjRjFM+7qgpmo9MiXC3zkZ/CuPfULA/G VFoHyLKw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sNCuq-0000000E53p-0FUq; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:49:32 +0000 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sNCug-0000000E4x1-3AIs for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:49:24 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4W9dbz0KCcz6HJcq; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 22:48:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F8051400D3; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 22:49:11 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.174.77) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 15:49:10 +0100 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 15:49:09 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Will Deacon , "Catalin Marinas" CC: Marc Zyngier , , , , , , , Mark Rutland , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , "Miguel Luis" , James Morse , "Salil Mehta" , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Hanjun Guo , Gavin Shan , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Karl Heubaum Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/19] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug Message-ID: <20240628154909.000044d9@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <867celjfng.wl-maz@kernel.org> References: <20240529133446.28446-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> <20240613112511.00006331@huawei.com> <867celjfng.wl-maz@kernel.org> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.203.174.77] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500002.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.78) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240628_074923_088523_08EA7D40 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.16 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:11:47 +0100 Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:25:27 +0100, > Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > On Wed, 29 May 2024 14:34:27 +0100 > > Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > > v10: > > > - Make acpi_processor_set_per_cpu() return 0 / error rather than bool > > > to simplify error handling at the call sites. > > > (Thanks to both Rafael and Gavin who commented on this) > > > - Gather tags. > > > - Rebase on v6.10-rc1 > > > > > > The approach to the GICv3 changes stablized very late in the 6.10 cycle. > > > Subject to Marc taking a final look at those, I think we are now > > > in a good state wrt to those and the ACPI parts. The remaining code > > > that hasn't received review tags from the relevant maintainers > > > is the arm64 specific arch_register_cpu(). Given I think this will go > > > through the arm64 tree, hopefully they have just been waiting for > > > everything else to be ready. > > > > Marc, Will, Catalin, > > > > Any comments on this series? We definitely want to finally land this > > in 6.11! > > > > Marc, in practice I think you already gave feedback on the the GICv3 > > changes in here as part of the discussions in the earlier version threads, > > but if you have time for a final glance through it would be much appreciated. > > Thanks for all your earlier help on this btw. > > I've had a quick look and the GICv3 parts look OK to me (you should > now have by tags for both patches). > > Thanks, > > M. Thanks again for your help with this one Marc. Will, Catalin? We are nearly at RC6 and this series has been unchanged all cycle. Great to hear your opinions on this. My assumption is that it will go through your tree if you are happy with it. Thanks, Jonathan