From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA74C2BD09 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 13:36:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=pWNAf3p49ADF+grtg0AjwZw1fJJ0XpdhaFfjlvkPqhg=; b=XoFuOam+HgTlX/DT7lfacx/cA9 +nwbEiOR1H18+EqCTdfwXuD+8H3k7qPZiGcLGfQxMPEf2fmVPSFWhgNO9/nY7q8Pw2yZXjGGjic3U E2oJCJTNwtSEHUpqPZvsJYH0eM51F9p/PtjtT/Xh4FqO4Em6xBBXvn9XUKdRYTZpelMaK2HxgNG2Q 4E4ERLwsBbk5x43pKJbBYkhfQkFHTILzC0/IADVpE/5mVz65/9iWcEZYl3E9yeij7aPvTi4ZzBHln /e5qcMb5D+bK63UwiVPhQl5vkizdMScVvT7u8RqOMQGPFGPJ/YqM8RLQJjXFUWSEpDMfD82PT359D jd5E+yPQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sOHCo-00000003WLS-0RcU; Mon, 01 Jul 2024 13:36:30 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([145.40.73.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sOHCd-00000003WHj-0QT8 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2024 13:36:20 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C80CE13B7; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 13:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89964C116B1; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 13:36:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1719840976; bh=IyKj2r7YH7W35QQg8S7BTDhhHquZxi+k9qw6W/UklM4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sC6HqR5CIgbDuq/GvhXAjEK1ujQ06d36jvdU+BFRGdCM90kmTE/dbG6rgyL80eQpy Cddb768m3ioZhKC5LLLNzaC3Pp/vnuz4FKi0vK+Yx75CSpbYfWNHPFXu6Z7zeTf6ci EN7M0TF0Fwtl2zzSnxllxZ7Uf2Dw6ESXghb/X/qJq2bJ7FAIUcgTY4ZpWjVrnP9YZk 7l7xpv0TBYX9QYMTzZOOqZU+aCzNpaXYHVxzvnSycFJyfdcLRnmjj3lfwYxhXnPMc4 rGMjx/E2INs50FYG45pKN4600WcKFEOWJmoYMyqgoKv/flThchTLBEJfRyPIujD+n7 F86wnylyHw1pw== Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 14:36:12 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Robin Murphy Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jialong.yang@shingroup.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf: Add Arm Network-on-Chip PMU driver Message-ID: <20240701133611.GC2250@willie-the-truck> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240701_063619_338099_FD3E885C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.67 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Robin, On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 01:29:51PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > > Somewhat later than hoped (sorry!), now that it's finally had the chance > for enough testing to flush out all the silly bugs, here's the NI-700 > driver I've had kicking around in various forms for the last 18 months. > I squashed in NI-710AE support since that appeared in the meantime and > the differences are minimal, however I have not felt compelled to go > back and genericise all the original NI-700 references. I don't think > I'm giving too much away to say that there will be further new product > support to add in future, so I will be back with more soon enough. > > Note that the driver patch depends on the the cpumask_any_and_but() > addition queued in arm64/for-next/perf. I left some minor comments on the driver code, but I think this probably needs a respin anyway as the binding is still pending an Ack from the DT folks. Will