From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6D51C2BD09 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 10:33:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ZGb1cCILfWabrhEPW9MN7cDxqCPm8sdFzgdLWDhUoJ4=; b=licEuIFjQoI6vw nIXPAdVz7Nu2KQbv9Tr7PlANwfARSrwkjPl+7cmMW9Rk1A9P+o6bNYL6CH/OZBm+HWF60nyEK/GB3 OI1SRlDtN7W6/ruLcYbxmwnMlinQ5Cpg7nKIephlGcDtEheCTo9723nen4UvY4l+UT3oIp52Ub3HI 2zEc9/cs2u1KafBKetCqmqX7JaW2kW3wbwkZXdKwjUECBelzH2IXxi9uZ7/JbRh/aItgNSwJ8LDfJ fpyL6Fg+mcq8wG0/m3BYjNG6aV+9cODdD8zjypEdVkQaUesb2q2DhEXb1pSpMhpVgfTgnAWi2CK8r Jq7IJ9zNQh6ZXGcwlkrw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sQ2jX-000000004Yf-2ELT; Sat, 06 Jul 2024 10:33:35 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sQ2jJ-000000004Wx-2ezl for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2024 10:33:22 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7391761C67; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 10:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60B28C2BD10; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 10:33:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1720262000; bh=9mn5sKetYkjg8XAGBF2C+fUaflC2c2AHyRdi6dvBgHc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DmGsk8hNV9Yw2Pfn6CS4h/RQewJsdb/9lnJDw5H7OifNCKK2LcvBZRC/fGEqyhWyI /PVN7sFN38tLQOtdWL2uKGlGx/7bMyhKKd7BKxPmKHAzsK/Gn0P5yIF1Z5HRp9d2ZJ nCwhY9Kq/trEzXapOMuV4wW3n/bkNStWJQc7A+EGsuYtoVB0kFuYaPbfmmOwh6JliW H3oVVc92sutumR9ZdnljbwOTKfr0/CPopkb9K0qZO4Krm6YYB0D7ng6KJS8joCfg6d zVcPnwBLCiPCSZQztvdo/0+isyQ1jptNX8uJ/hNg05xy+PTyB4ouvAaxQY6SJ8Iq1g +9cs0ntJLsXWw== Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 11:33:11 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] iio: make masklength __private (round 1) Message-ID: <20240706113311.43812bd2@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20240702-dev-iio-masklength-private-v1-0-98193bf536a6@analog.com> <20240702212652.01241fc2@jic23-huawei> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240706_033321_759901_2A90E386 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.56 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, Alexandre Belloni , Lars-Peter Clausen , Michael Hennerich , Nuno Sa via B4 Relay , Cosmin Tanislav , nuno.sa@analog.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Claudiu Beznea , Guenter Roeck , Dmitry Rokosov , Benson Leung , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 03 Jul 2024 09:10:58 +0200 Nuno S=C3=A1 wrote: > On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 21:26 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:02:32 +0200 > > Nuno Sa via B4 Relay wrote: > > =20 > > > Hi Jonathan, > > >=20 > > > Here it goes the first round of what we discussed in [1] about > > > annotating .masklength as __private. Patches should be fairly simple = so > > > hopefully I did not messed up much... > > >=20 > > > Note that in core, there's one place where we're still directly writi= ng > > > into .masklength (when it's effectively set). The plan is then to > > > directly use ACCESS_PRIVATE() in there in the same patch where we mark > > > .masklength as __private. =20 > >=20 > > Makes sense. Series looks good to me, but I'll not pick it up just yet. > > I've tagged a like second 6.11 pull request, so this is probably 6.12 m= aterial > > unless things go particularly smoothly and Greg takes an additional last > > minute one as there is one set waiting for a fix that is in char-misc > > but not yet iio-togreg. > >=20 > > Jonathan > > =20 >=20 > Yeah, looks sane to me. Advantage of going in 6.12 is that (likely) we'' = get all > the conversions done. Given I'm not planning to send another pull request (no time for suitable testing in linux-next etc) for 6.11 I've started queuing up as probable 6.12 material. Usual process applies at this stage - I won't be pushing out as togreg until I can rebase on rc1. Applied and pushed out as testing for now with the typo Alexandru pointed out in adxl372 fixed up. Jonathan >=20 > - Nuno S=C3=A1 > > =20 >=20