From: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] thermal: st: switch from CONFIG_PM_SLEEP guards to pm_sleep_ptr()
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 19:34:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240716-thermal-v4-1-947b327e165c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240716-thermal-v4-0-947b327e165c@gmail.com>
Letting the compiler remove these functions when the kernel is built
without CONFIG_PM_SLEEP support is simpler and less error prone than the
use of #ifdef based kernel configuration guards.
Remove those guards on every ST thermal related drivers.
Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@gmail.com>
---
drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c | 4 +---
drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal_memmap.c | 2 +-
drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c | 8 +++-----
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c
index 2a105409864e..5f33543a3a54 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c
@@ -236,7 +236,6 @@ void st_thermal_unregister(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(st_thermal_unregister);
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
static int st_thermal_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct st_thermal_sensor *sensor = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -265,9 +264,8 @@ static int st_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
return 0;
}
-#endif
-SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(st_thermal_pm_ops, st_thermal_suspend, st_thermal_resume);
+DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(st_thermal_pm_ops, st_thermal_suspend, st_thermal_resume);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(st_thermal_pm_ops);
MODULE_AUTHOR("STMicroelectronics (R&D) Limited <ajitpal.singh@st.com>");
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal_memmap.c b/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal_memmap.c
index e427117381a4..97493d2b2f49 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal_memmap.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal_memmap.c
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void st_mmap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static struct platform_driver st_mmap_thermal_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "st_thermal_mmap",
- .pm = &st_thermal_pm_ops,
+ .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&st_thermal_pm_ops),
.of_match_table = st_mmap_thermal_of_match,
},
.probe = st_mmap_probe,
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c
index 34785b9276fc..ffd988600ed6 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c
@@ -440,7 +440,6 @@ static int stm_thermal_prepare(struct stm_thermal_sensor *sensor)
return ret;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
static int stm_thermal_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct stm_thermal_sensor *sensor = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -466,10 +465,9 @@ static int stm_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
return 0;
}
-#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
-static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stm_thermal_pm_ops,
- stm_thermal_suspend, stm_thermal_resume);
+static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stm_thermal_pm_ops,
+ stm_thermal_suspend, stm_thermal_resume);
static const struct thermal_zone_device_ops stm_tz_ops = {
.get_temp = stm_thermal_get_temp,
@@ -580,7 +578,7 @@ static void stm_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static struct platform_driver stm_thermal_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "stm_thermal",
- .pm = &stm_thermal_pm_ops,
+ .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&stm_thermal_pm_ops),
.of_match_table = stm_thermal_of_match,
},
.probe = stm_thermal_probe,
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-16 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-16 17:34 [PATCH v4 0/2] Add thermal management support for STi platform Raphael Gallais-Pou
2024-07-16 17:34 ` Raphael Gallais-Pou [this message]
2024-07-16 17:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] thermal: sti: depend on THERMAL_OF subsystem Raphael Gallais-Pou
2024-08-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Add thermal management support for STi platform Raphaël Gallais-Pou
2024-08-20 8:05 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240716-thermal-v4-1-947b327e165c@gmail.com \
--to=rgallaispou@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).