From: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com>, Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/4] Allow userspace to change ID_AA64PFR1_EL1
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 03:19:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240723072004.1470688-1-shahuang@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi guys,
This is another try to allow userspace to change ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, and we want to
give userspace the ability to control the visible feature set for a VM, which
could be used by userspace in such a way to transparently migrate VMs.
The patch series have four part:
The first patch disable those fields which KVM doesn't know how to handle, so
KVM will only expose value 0 of those fields to the guest.
The second patch check the FEAT_SSBS in guest IDREG instead of the cpu
capability.
The third patch allow userspace to change ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, it only advertise the
fields known to KVM and leave others unadvertise.
The fourth patch adds the kselftest to test if userspace can change the
ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.
Besides, I also noticed there is another patch [1] which try to make the
ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable. This patch [1] is try to enable GCS on baremental, and
add GCS support for the guest. What I understand is if we have GCS support on
baremental, it will be clear to how to handle them in KVM. And same for other
fields like NMI, THE, DF2, MTEX.. At that time, they can be writable.
[1] [PATCH v9 13/39] KVM: arm64: Manage GCS registers for guests
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240625-arm64-gcs-v9-13-0f634469b8f0@kernel.org/
Changelog:
----------
v4 -> v5:
* Only advertise fields which KVM know how to handle to userspace, leave
others unadvertised.
* Add a new patch to check FEAT_SSBS in IDREG instead of cpu capability.
* Tweak the kselftest writable fields.
* Improve the commit message.
v3 -> v4:
* Add a new patch to disable some feature which KVM doesn't know how to
handle in the register accessor.
* Handle all the fields in the register.
* Fixes a small cnt issue in kselftest.
v2 -> v3:
* Give more description about why only part of the fields can be writable.
* Updated the writable mask by referring the latest ARM spec.
v1 -> v2:
* Tackling the full register instead of single field.
* Changing the patch title and commit message.
RFCv1 -> v1:
* Fix the compilation error.
* Delete the machine specific information and make the description more
generable.
RFCv1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240612023553.127813-1-shahuang@redhat.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240617075131.1006173-1-shahuang@redhat.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240618063808.1040085-1-shahuang@redhat.com/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240628060454.1936886-2-shahuang@redhat.com/
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240718035017.434996-1-shahuang@redhat.com/
Shaoqin Huang (4):
KVM: arm64: Disable fields that KVM doesn't know how to handle in
ID_AA64PFR1_EL1
KVM: arm64: Use kvm_has_feat() to check if FEAT_SSBS is advertised to
the guest
KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to change ID_AA64PFR1_EL1
KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add writable test for ID_AA64PFR1_EL1
arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c | 12 +++++-----
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++-
.../selftests/kvm/aarch64/set_id_regs.c | 14 +++++++++---
3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-23 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-23 7:19 Shaoqin Huang [this message]
2024-07-23 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] KVM: arm64: Disable fields that KVM doesn't know how to handle in ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Shaoqin Huang
2024-07-23 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] KVM: arm64: Use kvm_has_feat() to check if FEAT_SSBS is advertised to the guest Shaoqin Huang
2024-07-23 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to change ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Shaoqin Huang
2024-07-23 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add writable test for ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Shaoqin Huang
2024-08-21 2:45 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] Allow userspace to change ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Shaoqin Huang
2024-08-25 16:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-08-25 17:09 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-08-25 19:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-08-25 17:01 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240723072004.1470688-1-shahuang@redhat.com \
--to=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eauger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sebott@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).