From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: Correct byte order of perfect_match
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 17:50:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240723175027.081423a1@fedora.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240723-stmmac-perfect-match-v1-1-678a800343b2@kernel.org>
Hello Simon,
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 14:29:27 +0100
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> wrote:
> The perfect_match parameter of the update_vlan_hash operation is __le16,
> and is correctly converted from host byte-order in the lone caller,
> stmmac_vlan_update().
>
> However, the implementations of this caller, dwxgmac2_update_vlan_hash()
> and dwxgmac2_update_vlan_hash(), both treat this parameter as host byte
> order, using the following pattern:
>
> u32 value = ...
> ...
> writel(value | perfect_match, ...);
>
> This is not correct because both:
> 1) value is host byte order; and
> 2) writel expects a host byte order value as it's first argument
>
> I believe that this will break on big endian systems. And I expect it
> has gone unnoticed by only being exercised on little endian systems.
>
> The approach taken by this patch is to update the callback, and it's
> caller to simply use a host byte order value.
>
> Flagged by Sparse.
> Compile tested only.
>
> Fixes: c7ab0b8088d7 ("net: stmmac: Fallback to VLAN Perfect filtering if HASH is not available")
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Thanks,
Maxime
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-23 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-23 13:29 [PATCH net] net: stmmac: Correct byte order of perfect_match Simon Horman
2024-07-23 15:50 ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
2024-07-24 14:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240723175027.081423a1@fedora.home \
--to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).