From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA6B7C3DA70 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:50:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=3ky7BpRUFNSyLFVzPEKglKW+EkrtEr1rmDDAjwiIX2s=; b=y/oEBoukmJv+WkYLX1+8oPhKgd 1OIo1YXAvo2+JnKdhyTBzcpHDmKkvz1ESoqXv6I3gcmnEs0uQqEnTBcyp9TITwMqe+5utST+MtigY f56Cp8NN8cWfBP4OLgIvzRzbZVRVvNvNHkw+mXExnB4EtBM3dutyWv9hCbEjOlQZsx5RYSWslIV5+ Vpbch4igaIf/Wm93gpLbZjz9wt70l4nEdBP3FotpMrlNNBQ2it5NaunNGQAFCbtP26FrS5bIfG5UG VZU+xj2fdV9Hxnf4qkyrLCh1LpvSoKxyhqbcExe/7C4tUZV9eYYVa9LDJtZyzzl+BcXZhJjWQAVCn GEDNDmew==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sYq3Y-0000000FvaK-34Uz; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:50:36 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([145.40.73.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sYq36-0000000FvUx-1kl2; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:50:09 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A7FCE1141; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE6B2C4AF0F; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:50:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1722358204; bh=r3X8C/3sWlCsyEECb963nRYST3e36OQCZGpGejhXErU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ko3XZPEdtdl2sPr6s46xPFbd66QXg+miej6Cbb1GsG7uIIPEsup07vHsotmwHVoOB essYkhUabKD4F8O7z3jtNn/S0QHbBE4PPv5/AzRZjgjJC5O1U3Ppa56X4N+Butlnkt 0K1Zws/MmxgMirLHC6tUgdXbniQGKXvNGZcZ7dcBsBBJ1RD/0aaE8VdfgjkMaGqNAL DQMtIXgDQZk+uc2klppC42Uup+oafEGnEfIK0UyATrQVagWUjbMn7BV1HjBwj8Zh3y SBTAHM7c74Cij2tOr/CemKxTtcm9dy274vhurvWGkgVqy7J9z/0ievfXL3qZ4JqTNn RGx1+0o3z71vA== Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:50:02 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Varshini Rajendran Cc: lee@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, ychuang3@nuvoton.com, schung@nuvoton.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/27] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: add microchip's sam9x7 sfr Message-ID: <20240730165002.GA1508552-robh@kernel.org> References: <20240729065603.1986074-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com> <20240729070603.1990265-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240729070603.1990265-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240730_095008_667739_13B7194C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.43 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:36:03PM +0530, Varshini Rajendran wrote: > Add compatible for sam9x7 SoC's SFR. That's (kind of) obvious from the diff. How is the block on the new SoC the same or different from the prior chip? It's kind of strange that one of these blocks which tend to be register bit soup of left over controls would be the same or a superset of another SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran > --- > Changes in v6: > > - New patch in v6 as the syscon devices are moved to a new file > upstream. > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml | 188 +++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-) Put this in your own schema file. I don't think we want get into more complicated cases here. Rob