From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: selftests: arm64: Make use of sysreg defintions in get-reg-list
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 22:57:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240802-kvm-arm64-get-reg-list-v1-0-3a5bf8f80765@kernel.org> (raw)
The system register definitions in the arm64 get-reg-list are all done
with directly specified magic numbers rather than using the definitions
we import from the main kernel. This is error prone, and requires us to
audit the additions to get-reg-list separately to what we do when
specifying the registers for the main kernel. Since Marc has indicated
that this isn't a deliberate or desired choice let's start using the
constants we have defined.
We first manually update the data used to filter registers based on ID
register fields to use a simplified macro that specifies the register
and ID field in a muc more compact fashion. This is done first since
there is an error in the ID register field for the S1PIE registers. We
then replace all the remaining named system register specifications with
use of the existing KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG() macro.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
Mark Brown (2):
KVM: selftests: arm64: Simplify specification of filtered registers
KVM: selftests: arm64: Use generated defines for named system registers
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 237 ++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 8400291e289ee6b2bf9779ff1c83a291501f017b
change-id: 20240802-kvm-arm64-get-reg-list-a86a37460bdd
Best regards,
--
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-02 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-02 21:57 Mark Brown [this message]
2024-08-02 21:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: arm64: Simplify specification of filtered registers Mark Brown
2024-08-04 11:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-08-02 21:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: arm64: Use generated defines for named system registers Mark Brown
2024-08-03 9:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-08-05 16:16 ` Mark Brown
2024-08-06 8:03 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240802-kvm-arm64-get-reg-list-v1-0-3a5bf8f80765@kernel.org \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).