From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 805ACC3DA4A for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 02:59:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ehjLa4wk0PsVrRWlV3uf73XuGfP1H4C1N7UP+iiDQTs=; b=UDd9XTybvJHwqRTXcniQ2dmUDW IVGQBKVRUiwJnmLAnGJn5X09BAdVAlpMObx77FTBAAMOxR7vifqS5WQFLY7dM46dxNwHLGW4Mnn2k 7aQJuk8tfPO0Lj1y0uuUZBBWBnX8v6v3O42iJmmQLExhEsnNKixBK7mZ2Kuqh1oW8/IVhMcVVAEHQ hhffcl9F70hMjaE6Jmp+keeVcsET0Ecj9PT+hrAD25/N7H4H87ybNes+f6T1E/hONCaVm/JaBrL2O N6cKhNFdQ/49MmC2/69E3Fn0IhVCAxgmr/CpuKKIDJaHgRWQgkAti/+1F+Gv6cl/wOlxbFrNFh6do PPtMUFYg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1scFqH-0000000A5RG-3LEN; Fri, 09 Aug 2024 02:59:01 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1scFpi-0000000A5Lv-10El for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2024 02:58:27 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED22CE16C3; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 02:58:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2F99C32782; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 02:58:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1723172302; bh=bz9nhQIN68rliIlQwFtbNxyMdG7FAqda1nTylmhka+M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FmAVLbCSCRp8O5sabC8ZA9Fa2UUWiO/oGl54klQO5M7hAyxEj76clzs1czMZAsL1l qqEBFHFOBMF+B8i/loc6HelWxB5dmnNjz85wStJ4hKUcmoDtpdaSkkq2TOauEKnZOB dZWV3KVBpOGHjku33R+mJMhFsMw0idKGqByaujnHY5jNdvqdUCcmR/y1qIE0HrqCy2 zc/37hS1nvogm0AwyyRCYb2gNwq11txgewgV8A7mvBKuQOUOub7Whw2QndAezhXmu4 zuPZAcLp132TMDVXUSgL1B1nCpjj7cYENNrYw57QyKzb/KdxuC7drrS/pqcb8cxWGS 7E9dI40Enn3Lg== Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 19:58:19 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Francesco Dolcini Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Wei Fang , Shenwei Wang , Clark Wang , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Richard Cochran , Linux Team , Francesco Dolcini , imx@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] net: fec: add PPS channel configuration Message-ID: <20240808195819.74f9e594@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240807144349.297342-1-francesco@dolcini.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240808_195826_483160_0C73BE5B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.20 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 23:57:23 +0200 Francesco Dolcini wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 04:43:45PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > From: Francesco Dolcini > > > > Make the FEC Ethernet PPS channel configurable from device tree. > > I realized that I forgot the `net-next` subject patch prefix on this series, > let me know if I should re-send it with it added, thanks. Hm, normally I'd say no, but we also didn't get patch 4 CCed to us. We use patchwork for a lot of things (including CI ingest) and if we don't get all the patches patchwork considers the series incomplete. Could you either repost and CC netdev@ on all 4 or repost just the 3 patches meant for netdev as a standalone series?