From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] memory: atmel-ebi: use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:38:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240814173834.000002c8@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240812-cleanup-h-of-node-put-memory-v1-1-5065a8f361d2@linaro.org>
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:33:55 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> Obtain the device node reference with scoped/cleanup.h to reduce error
> handling and make the code a bit simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Hi,
Comments inline.
> ---
> drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c | 29 ++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c b/drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c
> index e8bb5f37f5cb..fcbfc2655d8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> * Copyright (C) 2013 Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@traphandler.com>
> */
>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> @@ -517,7 +518,7 @@ static int atmel_ebi_dev_disable(struct atmel_ebi *ebi, struct device_node *np)
> static int atmel_ebi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - struct device_node *child, *np = dev->of_node, *smc_np;
> + struct device_node *child, *np = dev->of_node;
> struct atmel_ebi *ebi;
> int ret, reg_cells;
> struct clk *clk;
> @@ -541,30 +542,24 @@ static int atmel_ebi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ebi->clk = clk;
>
> - smc_np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "atmel,smc", 0);
> + struct device_node *smc_np __free(device_node) = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node,
> + "atmel,smc", 0);
Trivial:
I'd line break this as
> + struct device_node *smc_np __free(device_node) =
of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "atmel,smc", 0);
>
> ebi->smc.regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(smc_np);
> - if (IS_ERR(ebi->smc.regmap)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(ebi->smc.regmap);
> - goto put_node;
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(ebi->smc.regmap))
> + return PTR_ERR(ebi->smc.regmap);
>
> ebi->smc.layout = atmel_hsmc_get_reg_layout(smc_np);
> - if (IS_ERR(ebi->smc.layout)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(ebi->smc.layout);
> - goto put_node;
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(ebi->smc.layout))
> + return PTR_ERR(ebi->smc.layout);
>
> ebi->smc.clk = of_clk_get(smc_np, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(ebi->smc.clk)) {
> - if (PTR_ERR(ebi->smc.clk) != -ENOENT) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(ebi->smc.clk);
> - goto put_node;
> - }
> + if (PTR_ERR(ebi->smc.clk) != -ENOENT)
> + return PTR_ERR(ebi->smc.clk);
>
> ebi->smc.clk = NULL;
> }
> - of_node_put(smc_np);
The large change in scope is a bit inelegant as it now hangs on to
the smc_np much longer than before.
Maybe it's worth pulling out the modified code as a
atem_eb_probe_smc(struct device_node *smc_np, struct atmel_ebi_smc *smc )
or something like with a struct_group to define the atmel_ebi_smc
That would keep the tight scope for the data and generally simplify it
a bit.
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(ebi->smc.clk);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -615,10 +610,6 @@ static int atmel_ebi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> return of_platform_populate(np, NULL, NULL, dev);
> -
> -put_node:
> - of_node_put(smc_np);
> - return ret;
> }
>
> static __maybe_unused int atmel_ebi_resume(struct device *dev)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-14 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-12 13:33 [PATCH 0/9] memory: simplify with scoped/cleanup.h for device nodes Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 1/9] memory: atmel-ebi: use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:38 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-08-14 17:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 2/9] memory: atmel-ebi: simplify with scoped for each OF child loop Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 3/9] memory: samsung: exynos5422-dmc: use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-14 17:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 4/9] memory: stm32-fmc2-ebi: simplify with scoped for each OF child loop Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-14 17:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 5/9] memory: tegra-mc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-12 13:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] memory: tegra124-emc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-12 13:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] memory: tegra20-emc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-12 13:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] memory: tegra30-emc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-12 13:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] memory: ti-aemif: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-14 18:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240814173834.000002c8@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).