From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: signal: Update sigcontext reservations table
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:37:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240820133739.GA28338@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240729144149.249096-1-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 03:41:49PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> The table tracking space usage in sigcontext.__reserved[] has got
> a bit out of date.
>
> Update it, and clarify the opt-in constraints.
>
> Note, svl <= 64 would be a sufficient condition for keeping the
> sve_context within range when in streaming SVE mode under SME, but
> then za_context gets too big and userspace loses anyway. To keep
> the conditions simple, just write "svl <= 32" everywhere.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
>
> ---
>
> Note, this is a back-of-the-envelope calculation... but whatever way I
> slice it, __reserved[] looks pretty much full (!)
>
> If Mark in particular can double-check the SME impact, that would be
> appreciated.
>
> New arch features with a non-trivial amount of state that needs to be
> saved may need to be disabled by default and require explicitly turning
> on by a syscall unless we want to allow some ABI breakage (x86's
> experience suggests that the world takes a long time to explode when
> signal frames outgrow their official size, though).
>
> Either way, do we need a new strategy to slow down the filling of the
> remaining space? There is continuing demand on it (see e.g., [1]).
>
> Migration note: at least glibc since version 2.34 [2] has stopped
> offering compile-time constant signal stack size #defines to programs
> built with -D_GNU_SOURCE. [3] This should mitigate ABI breaks for
> programs that bother to size stacks correctly.
>
> I haven't checked what other libcs and runtimes are doing.
>
> Additional SME note: since userspace can freely switch in and out of
> streaming SVE mode and freely enable/disable ZA and ZT0, I'm assuming
> that none of sve_context, za_context and zt_context are mutually
> exclusive, but please shout if I have confused myself here.
>
> [1] [PATCH v4 18/29] arm64: add POE signal support
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240503130147.1154804-19-joey.gouly@arm.com/
>
> [2] [glibc] glibc-2.34
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=tag;h=9df03063320651bc629fa427eef3ac73fabb61ba
>
> [3] [glibc] sysconf: Add _SC_MINSIGSTKSZ/_SC_SIGSTKSZ [BZ #20305]
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;f=sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bits/sigstksz.h;h=6c57d320484988e87e446e2e60ce42816bf51d53
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h
> index 8a45b7a411e0..2cd60fd64e9a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h
> @@ -44,11 +44,18 @@ struct sigcontext {
> *
> * 0x210 fpsimd_context
> * 0x10 esr_context
> - * 0x8a0 sve_context (vl <= 64) (optional)
> + * 0x8a0 sve_context (vl <= 64 && svl <= 32) (optional)
> + * 0x10 tpidr2_context (optional)
> + * 0x410 za_context (svl <= 32) (optional)
> + * 0x50 zt_context (optional)
> + * 0x10 fpmr_context (optional)
> * 0x20 extra_context (optional)
> * 0x10 terminator (null _aarch64_ctx)
> *
> - * 0x510 (reserved for future allocation)
> + * 0x90 (reserved for future allocation)
> + *
> + * where vl is the non-streaming SVE vector length, as set with PR_SVE_SET_VL,
> + * and svl is the streaming SVE vector length, as set with PR_SME_SET_VL.
These are quite fiddly to check by hand, but the ones I *did* check
appear to be correct. The discussion with Mark seems tangential to the
actual diff, so I'm inclined to apply this if nobody objects.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-20 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-29 14:41 [PATCH] arm64: signal: Update sigcontext reservations table Dave Martin
2024-07-29 14:53 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-29 15:51 ` Dave Martin
2024-07-29 17:01 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-30 12:51 ` Dave Martin
2024-07-30 13:22 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-30 15:07 ` Dave Martin
2024-07-30 16:00 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-31 10:38 ` Dave Martin
2024-07-31 11:49 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-31 14:38 ` Dave Martin
2024-07-31 14:58 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-31 16:09 ` Dave Martin
2024-07-31 16:14 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-31 16:23 ` Dave Martin
2024-08-20 13:37 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2024-08-20 14:38 ` Dave Martin
2024-08-23 11:46 ` Will Deacon
2024-09-03 14:18 ` Dave Martin
2024-09-03 18:26 ` Mark Brown
2024-09-04 11:24 ` Dave Martin
2024-09-04 11:49 ` Mark Brown
2024-09-05 10:59 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240820133739.GA28338@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox