From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: <hjc@rock-chips.com>, <heiko@sntech.de>,
<andy.yan@rock-chips.com>, <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
<mripard@kernel.org>, <tzimmermann@suse.de>, <airlied@gmail.com>,
<daniel@ffwll.ch>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <krzk@kernel.org>,
<jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/5] drm/rockchip: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped()
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 12:32:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240823123203.00002aac@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240823092053.3170445-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 17:20:49 +0800
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
> Avoids the need for manual cleanup of_node_put() in early exits
> from the loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
There is more to do here, and looking at the code, I'm far from
sure it isn't releasing references it never had.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
> index 9a01aa450741..f5b3f18794dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
> @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static int rockchip_lvds_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> struct drm_encoder *encoder;
> struct drm_connector *connector;
> struct device_node *remote = NULL;
> - struct device_node *port, *endpoint;
Odd extra space before *port in original. Clean that up whilst here.
> + struct device_node *port;
Use __free(device_node) for *port as well.
So where the current asignment is.
struct device_node *port = of_graph_get_port_by_id(dev->of_node, 1);
> int ret = 0, child_count = 0;
> const char *name;
> u32 endpoint_id = 0;
> @@ -560,15 +560,13 @@ static int rockchip_lvds_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> "can't found port point, please init lvds panel port!\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - for_each_child_of_node(port, endpoint) {
> + for_each_child_of_node_scoped(port, endpoint) {
> child_count++;
> of_property_read_u32(endpoint, "reg", &endpoint_id);
> ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dev->of_node, 1, endpoint_id,
> &lvds->panel, &lvds->bridge);
> - if (!ret) {
> - of_node_put(endpoint);
> + if (!ret)
> break;
This then can simply be
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
"failed to find pannel and bridge node\n");
> - }
Various other paths become direct returns as well.
> }
The later code with remote looks suspect as not obvious who got the reference that
is being put but assuming that is correct, it's another possible place for __free based
cleanup.
> if (!child_count) {
> DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "lvds port does not have any children\n");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-23 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-23 9:20 [PATCH -next 0/5] drm: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped() Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-23 9:20 ` [PATCH -next 1/5] drm/rockchip: " Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-23 9:45 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-08-23 11:32 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-08-26 9:04 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-27 1:40 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-27 9:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-23 9:20 ` [PATCH -next 2/5] drm/mediatek: Fix missing of_node_put() for mtk_drm_get_all_drm_priv() Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-23 10:46 ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-08-25 5:16 ` Marion & Christophe JAILLET
2024-08-27 1:42 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-23 9:20 ` [PATCH -next 3/5] drm: of: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped() Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-23 9:20 ` [PATCH -next 4/5] drm/nouveau: " Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-23 9:20 ` [PATCH -next 5/5] gpu: host1x: Use for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240823123203.00002aac@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=hjc@rock-chips.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).