From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] pmdomain: rockchip: Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:53:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240827105343.00003a72@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240823-cleanup-h-guard-pm-domain-v1-1-8320722eaf39@linaro.org>
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 14:51:05 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() and
> for_each_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Ripe for some dev_err_probe() usage that will make this even nicer
as a cleanup.
Looks good as it stands
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c | 20 ++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> index 64b4d7120d83..5679ad336a11 100644
> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> @@ -804,11 +804,10 @@ static void rockchip_configure_pd_cnt(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
> static int rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
> struct device_node *parent)
> {
> - struct device_node *np;
> struct generic_pm_domain *child_domain, *parent_domain;
> int error;
>
> - for_each_child_of_node(parent, np) {
> + for_each_child_of_node_scoped(parent, np) {
> u32 idx;
>
> error = of_property_read_u32(parent, "reg", &idx);
> @@ -816,7 +815,7 @@ static int rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
> dev_err(pmu->dev,
> "%pOFn: failed to retrieve domain id (reg): %d\n",
> parent, error);
> - goto err_out;
> + return error;
> }
> parent_domain = pmu->genpd_data.domains[idx];
>
> @@ -824,7 +823,7 @@ static int rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
> if (error) {
> dev_err(pmu->dev, "failed to handle node %pOFn: %d\n",
> np, error);
> - goto err_out;
> + return error;
> }
>
> error = of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", &idx);
> @@ -832,7 +831,7 @@ static int rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
> dev_err(pmu->dev,
> "%pOFn: failed to retrieve domain id (reg): %d\n",
> np, error);
> - goto err_out;
> + return error;
> }
> child_domain = pmu->genpd_data.domains[idx];
>
> @@ -840,7 +839,7 @@ static int rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
> if (error) {
> dev_err(pmu->dev, "%s failed to add subdomain %s: %d\n",
> parent_domain->name, child_domain->name, error);
> - goto err_out;
> + return error;
> } else {
> dev_dbg(pmu->dev, "%s add subdomain: %s\n",
> parent_domain->name, child_domain->name);
> @@ -850,17 +849,12 @@ static int rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
> }
>
> return 0;
> -
> -err_out:
> - of_node_put(np);
> - return error;
> }
>
> static int rockchip_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> - struct device_node *node;
> struct device *parent;
> struct rockchip_pmu *pmu;
> const struct rockchip_pmu_info *pmu_info;
> @@ -918,12 +912,11 @@ static int rockchip_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> */
> mutex_lock(&dmc_pmu_mutex);
>
> - for_each_available_child_of_node(np, node) {
> + for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, node) {
> error = rockchip_pm_add_one_domain(pmu, node);
> if (error) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to handle node %pOFn: %d\n",
> node, error);
> - of_node_put(node);
> goto err_out;
> }
>
> @@ -931,7 +924,6 @@ static int rockchip_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (error < 0) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to handle subdomain node %pOFn: %d\n",
> node, error);
> - of_node_put(node);
> goto err_out;
> }
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-27 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-23 12:51 [PATCH 00/10] pmdomain: Simplify with cleanup.h Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-23 12:51 ` [PATCH 01/10] pmdomain: rockchip: Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-27 9:53 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-08-23 12:51 ` [PATCH 02/10] pmdomain: rockchip: Simplify locking with guard() Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-27 9:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-27 10:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-23 12:51 ` [PATCH 03/10] pmdomain: imx: gpc: Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-23 12:51 ` [PATCH 04/10] pmdomain: imx: gpcv2: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-23 12:51 ` [PATCH 05/10] pmdomain: qcom: cpr: Simplify with dev_err_probe() Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-27 9:45 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-08-23 12:51 ` [PATCH 06/10] pmdomain: qcom: cpr: Simplify locking with guard() Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-27 9:47 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-08-23 12:51 ` [PATCH 07/10] pmdomain: qcom: rpmhpd: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-27 9:48 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-08-23 12:51 ` [PATCH 08/10] pmdomain: qcom: rpmpd: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-27 9:49 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-08-23 12:51 ` [PATCH 09/10] pmdomain: renesas: rcar-gen4-sysc: Use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-27 7:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-08-27 9:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-27 9:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-27 10:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-08-27 11:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-11-27 13:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-08-23 12:51 ` [PATCH 10/10] pmdomain: renesas: rcar-sysc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-27 7:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-09-13 12:01 ` [PATCH 00/10] pmdomain: Simplify with cleanup.h Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240827105343.00003a72@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).