From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59323C83F16 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:29:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=TYiFE0Autfw0+HKMUaPrAY0BO7zl9nQGdSlSpN9+YHw=; b=yuOu9BezvcVItOs9L916J7ODd/ XWJY7/o1rvcR2m8LPYq6mdILGAY+SHzoJ3kfyG+0LIN1HsXrySTFLcbfeAnMiu6gD3WG2oZYBC1uj SHuLRIj7kGj3IwbROr4IS5dudDh9C0o/4VvAqu75Bd365XoLGkn6SHleddyKq0Yp752mKxShMwEgk 6rV9wtObYT706k6OIhIqLlPUkhWx2t/IRAwjFmQLk4CbCb9EQfYkIzq9FkW0YQegIfTF3edE3gLaD Hve/aDVfEVzLZbQ+KFPmWEcgTDeDvlZDaNIR8giy/CkvIyraMNUjvDP2uIuGrkS26TDKpbaJbixGO R6eZHcKQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sjfCy-00000002B8b-2jXK; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:29:04 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([147.75.193.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sjfC0-00000002AUO-1L6p for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:28:06 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABC1A4402D; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BFEFC4CEC1; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:28:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1724938082; bh=BCz8KQT3nNiku5vwtOuMR0szTCOE3r+CGyVRcDkjTcg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LlrpPLFYXygagotx7+N3+XIHWOWL2VFPduet7kczz/2iJ9fThHKNWsTVHHAuNy7cV KsMx6E0k8j89Oski9nKCEFc50wozYAaGfbSdoDeDqyTK9X/z1Nf/DVTm8H1M69L7D5 auX3BearRXImb8/wNcQhR7sBCjf3iBV37huQSWx0= Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:28:01 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Abel Vesa Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, abelvesa@kernel.org, peng.fan@nxp.com, Wei Fang , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch v3 0/4] add NETCMIX block control support on i.MX95 Message-ID: <20240829-ambrosial-smart-wombat-fb571e@lemur> References: <20240829011849.364987-1-wei.fang@nxp.com> <172491778768.2521946.17064463983702008243.b4-ty@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240829_062804_560460_034A8EFF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.14 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:53:28AM GMT, Abel Vesa wrote: > > [1/4] dt-bindings: clock: add i.MX95 NETCMIX block control > > commit: 4b78b54762dbfc2f22f28655fa3cf6f5d50de197 > > [2/4] dt-bindings: clock: add RMII clock selection > > commit: b4f62001ccd3fa953769ccbd313c9a7a4f5f8f3d > > [3/4] clk: imx95: enable the clock of NETCMIX block control > > commit: 42dc425fa8b5be982bcc2025d5bf30be8b26da86 > > [4/4] arm64: dts: imx95: Add NETCMIX block control support > > (no commit info) > > For some reason, b4 ty thinks it's OK to mention this 4th patch as > applied, while it is obviously not. > > I only applied the first 3 patches. Sorry for the confusion. It's because you did "b4 am" on the entire series. We couldn't find the matching commit for 4/4, but this often happens because maintainers tweak the title or the patch contents, so we can't always assume that the patch wasn't applied just because we can't find the exact match. If you know you're going to apply a subset, it's best to run "b4 am -P 1-3" so that b4 knows for a fact that you only intended to apply a subset. -K