From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECD18CA0ED3 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 23:00:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References: List-Owner; bh=CMDrBF/rAVy3KHApy/yEj5NzBCOpwMMxw54N8bcGpoQ=; b=uAQ8nz8a+zqt1B 6KlOopnGxL22ksqjWlVrfjX5UNoPUkAfhWz+2XYNkk2TcOAMH7joAHna9Lm/YZK7E4eitBZIkkGub mCnrQePeRmCXAyRkLixazch+lPeGoyEliyfN/7Z/cwCYS+As8p3kS80dtbduR2hA7osj6xRAFKrUR tq4FqiKNZrhJmO5oc8kDJxTJFQBR9YlujzJMxZ1eldOcpoPqjbt/E6arV0Ea9GQh0xFtbqKR1Zwsd +51icsW3xZsw8/908/lml/VvvRQkFPomAQ7yvHIars2o8JsRRH5XkZlN2r1i3Si05d9ItVuhx+rFB WRkrMJSuwxeD7aW2JiGA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1slG21-0000000FjTU-0mHG; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 23:00:21 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([147.75.193.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1slG16-0000000FjFv-1dzU for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 22:59:25 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E272A40680; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 22:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7C12C4CEC2; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 22:59:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1725317963; bh=Km/6KlnmQOWJjXq++Cne0pmAvoAL3JA6Ik/pIQ5aMsc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=AIErJMG7cKzgaRygrtjzs5mL/pC6veeZwCogVHvV/WBtBT/cKLnuDR62hPgSMcBe8 /yuQvKlu7eI5fNCDD4J/dgkzx3ooEmujnp/daGOhR5v+4eVZtVVrMG6e2PG0iFSRZF NIrYhg19ylgXYLM2wQvCc4o/jRlPuA9dEeuQ9jUM3iaLWlUG5Nz2p9/Gke8q0PWRiS gkFDR8G5EB7ytWVL5yqqdSrm6GfhVY2FI1lTb/B4Wd7W2cvFQPmCDCXe7szd35TzKm tlnvY4CVN8T/3+7HoZ8o1Y5GcnDRVLLdtp21+GlcY5VliDWak3j8Yi1r0hUiRotEtK IByHh8ZKne3NQ== Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 17:59:21 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Frank Li Cc: Richard Zhu , Lucas Stach , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Philipp Zabel , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] PCI: imx6: Fix establish link failure in EP mode for iMX8MM and iMX8MP Message-ID: <20240902225921.GA232316@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240902_155924_514293_8BC20FC3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.57 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 06:51:36PM -0400, Frank Li wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 04:12:40PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 04:18:08PM -0400, Frank Li wrote: > > > From: Richard Zhu > > > > Maybe "iMX8MP" in this subject should be "i.MX8MP" as in the subject > > of the next patch? > > > > And if so, maybe it should be "i.MX8MM" here, too? > > i.MX8MP and i.MX8MM is more formal. Many other place in kernel tree also > use iMX8MP and iMX8MM. > > Do you need me repost it? No, no point it that, we can tidy that easily. Same for the stable tag, we can add that.