From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 641E5EDE9AB for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:55:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=WC4pBiIUDalgyXWe+fvymc628DQH06NWE+NGwbJbeaQ=; b=5D73e1tnVgFjjHYgo9q++0xfb/ DdnNYcnxuwtqnhHHrEsbFDYbuSN/1jZi1kXbnVsCKEf29EkxEnY/YsCYec3lM8asroNxnG6PkZL2Y UxZeRLtngcPcir6F/H39EBUaNyHYTpFuItlsb2b2xQVeWuJ4dvGNyQ8do3hpNNZhG2v6ojIjgJda1 XevRdgotLX5IwAnZyWAS0e5YhLYZbvHT25vj5q6kkP0vIVIbB9yzLTXM+sCjrPttszQBhSmBiGUaV U4VkPdRTKN3SUS5+owxwJ13EOL7Y1n/qfE03Djz/JoIdPQYVkeIU+Z3ZIqq9JTqWKERC45cgFtJVN tOlPmGeQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1so61Y-00000006oQ2-3aLJ; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:55:36 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1so60W-00000006oKJ-3C91 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:54:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803CD5C0548; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D72BC4CEC3; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:54:31 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , bpf , Linux trace kernel , adubey@linux.ibm.com, "Naveen N. Rao" , KP Singh , linux-arm-kernel , Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , Alexei Starovoitov , Catalin Marinas , Florent Revest , Puranjay Mohan Subject: Re: Unsupported CONFIG_FPROBE and CONFIG_RETHOOK on ARM64 Message-ID: <20240910145431.20e9d2e5@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240910_115432_877557_A935053B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:23:29 -0700 Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > Does Linus have to be in CC to get any reply here? Come on, it's been > almost a full week. Just FYI, an email like this does piss people off. You are getting upset for waiting "almost a full week"? A full week is what we tell people to wait if they don't get a response. And your email was directed to multiple people. Then pointing out myself and Masami because we didn't respond? We are not arm64 maintainers, and that email looked more directed at them. Funny part is, I was just about to start reviewing Masami's fprobe patches when I read this. Now I feel reluctant to. I'll do it anyway because they are Masami's patches, but if they were yours, I would have pushed it off a week or two with that attitude. Again, just letting you know. -- Steve