From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59DF9EDE9AB for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:00:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References:List-Owner; bh=FQMeQF4QWOvOwyfnyJIZkp2n/RUHgq5zXm7CrJ6HFls=; b=5D0Fuuyht3gNdOv855QItJ/ZPi h4ORQ8Nxu0u9tHYb8BSClQz9xWz40ZeQm3G1QB9gYWM08uDW7GkWwlNsx0TqUR5nZZzX+40/HA77b KorSp4lFXIACwtr8Iap6FK0YC4aqNuhhCHICIxZI+cJu4CiPFxlYdllavRAuDjXSWtvY0UI6HDtCM HrRxy5+n1Q9solgNUNK1XuKEm6pV8UVKfLrHNr+G293znr3179nYmuWYfknX9FlBNpPtG2K/mv3VR 1pLC6MeNMVawowLsWl8yxISid163vgOmc5TbNmZZ7G4oPjfBq1tkphXEjbEfkbVfEqzz/a2NHrnqW BcodjADA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1so5AK-00000006gcs-17N7; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:00:36 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1so59G-00000006gPQ-22kr; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 17:59:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A145C0145; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 17:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3145BC4CEC3; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 17:59:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1725991169; bh=2CwoTyoBU8Cyahl9bkaERJ3bw5QE6HHOa8rGrLy7A94=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=crV/1QrB7exGQ5wTtH1y64D2zlSbwamqVTrSRLEU7DIQrE4XstcdwB1W9JqUbfMA0 3b3fmD12ZzOPGrUAIe90jORTfy45zHGEWWBUaPcClTnunsT0HIc2GDgicjOLG79To8 d3j799fXRizJM2pgXqqXgAZztb9kAHr8/o30FNmgtNSqaBtA4d9jDQujLQEiuAtkcm OSkahkr1HccOOrH9LMXl1xIgxeW5U+2P0MxX98od0cUvfILqtkvlrbI7Aux70+T1DW on9bBcuPN4FLc45FWAd2tVxqCG5ejqUEQtrbm1GzAKOiiAD1dAPYmE41gsvt1R+bXe N9O5v+NbEWWrg== Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:59:27 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Jim Quinlan Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Cyril Brulebois , Stanimir Varbanov , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Krzysztof Kozlowski , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, jim2101024@gmail.com, Florian Fainelli , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Philipp Zabel , "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" , "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] PCI: brcmstb: Use bridge reset if available Message-ID: <20240910175927.GA590299@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240910_105930_680712_666177AB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 30.05 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 01:30:41PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 10:26 AM Jim Quinlan wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 3:18 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 06:57:18PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > > > The 7712 SOC has a bridge reset which can be described in the device tree. > > > > Use it if present. Otherwise, continue to use the legacy method to reset > > > > the bridge. > > > > > > > static void brcm_pcie_bridge_sw_init_set_generic(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val) > > > > { > > > > - u32 tmp, mask = RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_MASK; > > > > - u32 shift = RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_SHIFT; > > > > + if (val) > > > > + reset_control_assert(pcie->bridge_reset); > > > > + else > > > > + reset_control_deassert(pcie->bridge_reset); > > > > > > > > - tmp = readl(pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie)); > > > > - tmp = (tmp & ~mask) | ((val << shift) & mask); > > > > - writel(tmp, pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie)); > > > > + if (!pcie->bridge_reset) { > > > > + u32 tmp, mask = RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_MASK; > > > > + u32 shift = RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_SHIFT; > > > > + > > > > + tmp = readl(pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie)); > > > > + tmp = (tmp & ~mask) | ((val << shift) & mask); > > > > + writel(tmp, pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie)); > > > > + } > > > > > > This pattern looks goofy: > > > > > > reset_control_assert(pcie->bridge_reset); > > > if (!pcie->bridge_reset) { > > > ... > > > > > > If we're going to test pcie->bridge_reset at all, it should be first > > > so it's obvious what's going on and the reader doesn't have to go > > > verify that reset_control_assert() ignores and returns success for a > > > NULL pointer: > > > > > > if (pcie->bridge_reset) { > > > if (val) > > > reset_control_assert(pcie->bridge_reset); > > > else > > > reset_control_deassert(pcie->bridge_reset); > > > > > > return; > > > } > > > > > > u32 tmp, mask = RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_MASK; > > > ... > > > > > Will do. > > Hi Bjorn, > > It is not clear to me if you want a new series -- which would be V7 -- > or you are okay with the current series V6. If the latter, someone > sent in a fixup commit which must be included. > Please advise. Krzysztof amended this on the branch. Take a look here and verify that it makes sense to you: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/tree/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c?h=controller/brcmstb#n752 If that looks right to you, no need to post a new v7. I think Krzysztof also integrated an "int num_inbound_wins" fix; is that the one you mean? If I'm thinking of the right one, you can check that at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/tree/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c?h=controller/brcmstb#n1034 > > > Krzysztof, can you amend this on the branch? > > > > > > It will also make the eventual return checking and error message > > > simpler because we won't have to initialize "ret" first, and we can > > > "return 0" directly for the legacy case. > > > > > > Bjorn