From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Herve Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
"Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: phy: introduce ethtool_phy_ops to get and set phy configuration
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:17:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240912101724.6233b1e4@fedora.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZuJyJT-HgXJFe5ul@pengutronix.de>
Hello Oleksij,
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 06:46:29 +0200
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:27:09PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> ...
> >
> > +/**
> > + * struct phy_device_config - General PHY device configuration parameters for
> > + * status reporting and bulk configuration
> > + *
> > + * A structure containing generic PHY device information, allowing to expose
> > + * internal status to userspace, and perform PHY configuration in a controlled
> > + * manner.
> > + *
> > + * @isolate: The MII-side isolation status of the PHY
> > + * @loopback: The loopback state of the PHY
> > + */
> > +struct phy_device_config {
> > + bool isolate;
> > + bool loopback;
> > +};
>
> I would recommend to have loopback enum. There are different levels of
> loopback:
> https://www.ti.com/document-viewer/DP83TD510E/datasheet#GUID-50834313-DEF1-42FB-BA00-9B0902B2D7E4/TITLE-SNLS656SNLS5055224
>
> I imagine something like this:
>
> /*
> * enum phy_loopback_mode - PHY loopback modes
> * These modes represent different loopback configurations to
> * facilitate in-circuit testing of the PHY's digital and analog paths.
> */
> enum phy_loopback_mode {
> PHY_LOOPBACK_NONE = 0, /* No loopback mode enabled */
> PHY_LOOPBACK_MII, /* MII Loopback: MAC to PHY internal loopback */
> PHY_LOOPBACK_PCS, /* PCS Loopback: PCS layer loopback, no signal processing */
> PHY_LOOPBACK_DIGITAL, /* Digital Loopback: Loops back entire digital TX/RX path */
> PHY_LOOPBACK_ANALOG, /* Analog Loopback: Loops back after analog front-end */
> PHY_LOOPBACK_FAR_END /* Far-End (Reverse) Loopback: Receiver to MAC interface loopback */
> };
I agree with you on that, having the ability to fine-tune where the
loopback happens is really useful for debug. The main problem I would
see is to come-up with a set of modes that are somewhat generic, as
vendors implement a wide variety of loopback modes.
For example, on BaseT4 PHYs the Analog loopback doesn't exist and is
more akin to using a loopback stub, whereas the Digital loopback would
be a loopback at the PMD level (I don't know if that even exists).
That being said, the list of possible places to setup the loopback
within a PHY is finite and it's conceivable to come-up with a set of
loopback modes.
Thanks a lot for the feedback,
Maxime
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-12 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 21:27 [PATCH net-next 0/7] Allow controlling PHY loopback and isolate modes Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: phy: allow isolating PHY devices Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-12 18:30 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-09-13 7:43 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] net: phy: Allow flagging PHY devices that can't isolate their MII Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] net: phy: lxt: Mark LXT973 PHYs as having a broken isolate mode Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-12 12:24 ` Simon Horman
2024-09-12 12:56 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-13 5:29 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: phy: marvell10g: 88x3310 and 88x3340 don't support " Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: phy: introduce ethtool_phy_ops to get and set phy configuration Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-12 4:46 ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-09-12 8:17 ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: ethtool: phy: allow reporting and setting the phy isolate status Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] netlink: specs: introduce phy-set command along with configurable attributes Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-12 8:15 ` [PATCH net-next 0/7] Allow controlling PHY loopback and isolate modes Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-12 18:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-09-12 18:26 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-09-13 7:34 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-13 13:40 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240912101724.6233b1e4@fedora.home \
--to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).