From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ardb@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com,
will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Force position-independent veneers
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 06:49:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240927134905.GA430964@thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240927101838.3061054-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 11:18:38AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Certain portions of code always need to be position-independent
> regardless of CONFIG_RELOCATABLE, including code which is executed in an
> idmap or which is executed before relocations are applied. In some
> kernel configurations the LLD linker generates position-dependent
> veneers for such code, and when executed these result in early boot-time
> failures.
>
> Marc Zyngier encountered a boot failure resulting from this when
> building a (particularly cursed) configuration with LLVM, as he reported
> to the list:
Heh, I admire the "particularly cursed" bit.
> I've tested with GNU LD 2.30 to 2.42 inclusive and LLVM 13.0.1 to 19.1.0
> inclusive, using the kernel.org binaries from:
>
> * https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
> * https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/llvm/
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Thanks for the patch!
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Makefile | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Makefile b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> index f6bc3da1ef110..c8e237b20ef29 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
> #
> # Copyright (C) 1995-2001 by Russell King
>
> -LDFLAGS_vmlinux :=--no-undefined -X
> +LDFLAGS_vmlinux :=--no-undefined -X --pic-veneer
>
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE), y)
> # Pass --no-apply-dynamic-relocs to restore pre-binutils-2.27 behaviour
> --
> 2.30.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-27 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-27 10:18 [PATCH] arm64: Force position-independent veneers Mark Rutland
2024-09-27 10:42 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-09-27 13:49 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2024-10-01 13:03 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240927134905.GA430964@thelio-3990X \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox