* Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Defer probe of clients after smmu device bound
2024-10-01 5:56 [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Defer probe of clients after smmu device bound Pratyush Brahma
@ 2024-10-02 0:14 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-02 1:07 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-02 2:30 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-10-02 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratyush Brahma, will
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, robin.murphy, joro, jgg, jsnitsel, robdclark,
quic_c_gdjako, dmitry.baryshkov, linux-arm-kernel, iommu,
linux-kernel, Pratyush Brahma, Prakash Gupta
Hi Pratyush,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on soc/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.12-rc1 next-20241001]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Pratyush-Brahma/iommu-arm-smmu-Defer-probe-of-clients-after-smmu-device-bound/20241001-135852
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241001055633.21062-1-quic_pbrahma%40quicinc.com
patch subject: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Defer probe of clients after smmu device bound
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-004-20241002 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241002/202410020820.gY0d4AkK-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241002/202410020820.gY0d4AkK-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410020820.gY0d4AkK-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c: In function 'arm_smmu_probe_device':
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c:1441:32: warning: returning 'int' from a function with return type 'struct iommu_device *' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
1441 | return dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, "smmu dev has not bound yet\n");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +1441 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
1419
1420 static struct iommu_device *arm_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
1421 {
1422 struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = NULL;
1423 struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
1424 struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
1425 int i, ret;
1426
1427 if (using_legacy_binding) {
1428 ret = arm_smmu_register_legacy_master(dev, &smmu);
1429
1430 /*
1431 * If dev->iommu_fwspec is initally NULL, arm_smmu_register_legacy_master()
1432 * will allocate/initialise a new one. Thus we need to update fwspec for
1433 * later use.
1434 */
1435 fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
1436 if (ret)
1437 goto out_free;
1438 } else {
1439 smmu = arm_smmu_get_by_fwnode(fwspec->iommu_fwnode);
1440 if (!smmu)
> 1441 return dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, "smmu dev has not bound yet\n");
1442 }
1443
1444 ret = -EINVAL;
1445 for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
1446 u16 sid = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, fwspec->ids[i]);
1447 u16 mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK, fwspec->ids[i]);
1448
1449 if (sid & ~smmu->streamid_mask) {
1450 dev_err(dev, "stream ID 0x%x out of range for SMMU (0x%x)\n",
1451 sid, smmu->streamid_mask);
1452 goto out_free;
1453 }
1454 if (mask & ~smmu->smr_mask_mask) {
1455 dev_err(dev, "SMR mask 0x%x out of range for SMMU (0x%x)\n",
1456 mask, smmu->smr_mask_mask);
1457 goto out_free;
1458 }
1459 }
1460
1461 ret = -ENOMEM;
1462 cfg = kzalloc(offsetof(struct arm_smmu_master_cfg, smendx[i]),
1463 GFP_KERNEL);
1464 if (!cfg)
1465 goto out_free;
1466
1467 cfg->smmu = smmu;
1468 dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, cfg);
1469 while (i--)
1470 cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
1471
1472 ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
1473 if (ret < 0)
1474 goto out_cfg_free;
1475
1476 ret = arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(dev);
1477 arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
1478
1479 if (ret)
1480 goto out_cfg_free;
1481
1482 device_link_add(dev, smmu->dev,
1483 DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER);
1484
1485 return &smmu->iommu;
1486
1487 out_cfg_free:
1488 kfree(cfg);
1489 out_free:
1490 iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
1491 return ERR_PTR(ret);
1492 }
1493
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Defer probe of clients after smmu device bound
2024-10-01 5:56 [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Defer probe of clients after smmu device bound Pratyush Brahma
2024-10-02 0:14 ` kernel test robot
@ 2024-10-02 1:07 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-02 2:30 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-10-02 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratyush Brahma, will
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, robin.murphy, joro, jgg, jsnitsel, robdclark,
quic_c_gdjako, dmitry.baryshkov, linux-arm-kernel, iommu,
linux-kernel, Pratyush Brahma, Prakash Gupta
Hi Pratyush,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.12-rc1 next-20241001]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Pratyush-Brahma/iommu-arm-smmu-Defer-probe-of-clients-after-smmu-device-bound/20241001-135852
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241001055633.21062-1-quic_pbrahma%40quicinc.com
patch subject: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Defer probe of clients after smmu device bound
config: s390-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241002/202410020856.Gp3LtJKA-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241002/202410020856.Gp3LtJKA-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410020856.Gp3LtJKA-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c: In function 'arm_smmu_probe_device':
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c:1441:32: error: returning 'int' from a function with return type 'struct iommu_device *' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
1441 | return dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, "smmu dev has not bound yet\n");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +1441 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
1419
1420 static struct iommu_device *arm_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
1421 {
1422 struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = NULL;
1423 struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
1424 struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
1425 int i, ret;
1426
1427 if (using_legacy_binding) {
1428 ret = arm_smmu_register_legacy_master(dev, &smmu);
1429
1430 /*
1431 * If dev->iommu_fwspec is initally NULL, arm_smmu_register_legacy_master()
1432 * will allocate/initialise a new one. Thus we need to update fwspec for
1433 * later use.
1434 */
1435 fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
1436 if (ret)
1437 goto out_free;
1438 } else {
1439 smmu = arm_smmu_get_by_fwnode(fwspec->iommu_fwnode);
1440 if (!smmu)
> 1441 return dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, "smmu dev has not bound yet\n");
1442 }
1443
1444 ret = -EINVAL;
1445 for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
1446 u16 sid = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, fwspec->ids[i]);
1447 u16 mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK, fwspec->ids[i]);
1448
1449 if (sid & ~smmu->streamid_mask) {
1450 dev_err(dev, "stream ID 0x%x out of range for SMMU (0x%x)\n",
1451 sid, smmu->streamid_mask);
1452 goto out_free;
1453 }
1454 if (mask & ~smmu->smr_mask_mask) {
1455 dev_err(dev, "SMR mask 0x%x out of range for SMMU (0x%x)\n",
1456 mask, smmu->smr_mask_mask);
1457 goto out_free;
1458 }
1459 }
1460
1461 ret = -ENOMEM;
1462 cfg = kzalloc(offsetof(struct arm_smmu_master_cfg, smendx[i]),
1463 GFP_KERNEL);
1464 if (!cfg)
1465 goto out_free;
1466
1467 cfg->smmu = smmu;
1468 dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, cfg);
1469 while (i--)
1470 cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
1471
1472 ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
1473 if (ret < 0)
1474 goto out_cfg_free;
1475
1476 ret = arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(dev);
1477 arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
1478
1479 if (ret)
1480 goto out_cfg_free;
1481
1482 device_link_add(dev, smmu->dev,
1483 DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER);
1484
1485 return &smmu->iommu;
1486
1487 out_cfg_free:
1488 kfree(cfg);
1489 out_free:
1490 iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
1491 return ERR_PTR(ret);
1492 }
1493
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Defer probe of clients after smmu device bound
2024-10-01 5:56 [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Defer probe of clients after smmu device bound Pratyush Brahma
2024-10-02 0:14 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-02 1:07 ` kernel test robot
@ 2024-10-02 2:30 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-10-02 2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratyush Brahma, will
Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, robin.murphy, joro, jgg, jsnitsel, robdclark,
quic_c_gdjako, dmitry.baryshkov, linux-arm-kernel, iommu,
linux-kernel, Pratyush Brahma, Prakash Gupta
Hi Pratyush,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.12-rc1 next-20241001]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Pratyush-Brahma/iommu-arm-smmu-Defer-probe-of-clients-after-smmu-device-bound/20241001-135852
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241001055633.21062-1-quic_pbrahma%40quicinc.com
patch subject: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Defer probe of clients after smmu device bound
config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241002/202410021015.OHF2CJsc-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project fef3566a25ff0e34fb87339ba5e13eca17cec00f)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241002/202410021015.OHF2CJsc-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410021015.OHF2CJsc-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c:20:
In file included from include/linux/acpi.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/device.h:32:
In file included from include/linux/device/driver.h:21:
In file included from include/linux/module.h:19:
In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/elf.h:181:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h:11:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/pgalloc.h:18:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2228:
include/linux/vmstat.h:503:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
503 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
504 | item];
| ~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:510:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
510 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
511 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:517:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
517 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:523:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
523 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
524 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c:24:
In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
| ^
In file included from drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c:24:
In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
| ^
In file included from drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c:24:
In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c:1441:11: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion returning 'int' from a function with result type 'struct iommu_device *' [-Wint-conversion]
1441 | return dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, "smmu dev has not bound yet\n");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
16 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +1441 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
1419
1420 static struct iommu_device *arm_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
1421 {
1422 struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = NULL;
1423 struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
1424 struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
1425 int i, ret;
1426
1427 if (using_legacy_binding) {
1428 ret = arm_smmu_register_legacy_master(dev, &smmu);
1429
1430 /*
1431 * If dev->iommu_fwspec is initally NULL, arm_smmu_register_legacy_master()
1432 * will allocate/initialise a new one. Thus we need to update fwspec for
1433 * later use.
1434 */
1435 fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
1436 if (ret)
1437 goto out_free;
1438 } else {
1439 smmu = arm_smmu_get_by_fwnode(fwspec->iommu_fwnode);
1440 if (!smmu)
> 1441 return dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, "smmu dev has not bound yet\n");
1442 }
1443
1444 ret = -EINVAL;
1445 for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
1446 u16 sid = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, fwspec->ids[i]);
1447 u16 mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK, fwspec->ids[i]);
1448
1449 if (sid & ~smmu->streamid_mask) {
1450 dev_err(dev, "stream ID 0x%x out of range for SMMU (0x%x)\n",
1451 sid, smmu->streamid_mask);
1452 goto out_free;
1453 }
1454 if (mask & ~smmu->smr_mask_mask) {
1455 dev_err(dev, "SMR mask 0x%x out of range for SMMU (0x%x)\n",
1456 mask, smmu->smr_mask_mask);
1457 goto out_free;
1458 }
1459 }
1460
1461 ret = -ENOMEM;
1462 cfg = kzalloc(offsetof(struct arm_smmu_master_cfg, smendx[i]),
1463 GFP_KERNEL);
1464 if (!cfg)
1465 goto out_free;
1466
1467 cfg->smmu = smmu;
1468 dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, cfg);
1469 while (i--)
1470 cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
1471
1472 ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
1473 if (ret < 0)
1474 goto out_cfg_free;
1475
1476 ret = arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(dev);
1477 arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
1478
1479 if (ret)
1480 goto out_cfg_free;
1481
1482 device_link_add(dev, smmu->dev,
1483 DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER);
1484
1485 return &smmu->iommu;
1486
1487 out_cfg_free:
1488 kfree(cfg);
1489 out_free:
1490 iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
1491 return ERR_PTR(ret);
1492 }
1493
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread