From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 144C7CFB440 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 09:54:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=KbCo9Q+9TkGZ/xqMd8R2B0Tn+cbC6iUH3hkMXloVWXs=; b=1k7SZEJ4dDwJvSUFazCE2cvwbL 2kf/UnXDHsySXzhAyb/r8fNgpNsPPfR2zcLZrPzkoau54YdpMZLxeoHxwdhoysYaTNmOEiUptgxJx q73qZ9Gh1IGHLlaPYyVe8L0Ngij9vnfSJwMH4mGQqK5m4wjOXXXwxs/jPs3AN7tZEF55JstrOC2UF BYDIPkk/d8TFn7MJ+2EI0o2OCO1cbMEOEK6MP/jrJT+qtvEYFcbNf83PqrmbJUuzjTyMrFeP5WK/f JvkNmoQpJGW0fcI6P96P/eH77L6xfEFAeZ2S7/Fex2TimufAK8sr45nZHx1s8QEvuPRFyoXJ3Jtl0 hoacSGaA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sxkRV-00000001yPM-1YER; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:54:17 +0000 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sxkQB-00000001y3l-13ar for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:52:56 +0000 Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1662A40004; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 09:52:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1728294773; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KbCo9Q+9TkGZ/xqMd8R2B0Tn+cbC6iUH3hkMXloVWXs=; b=c4tBmR9opSgnKs9fwmEb6B2T3L6empi9/Jow7h8jkpZYA/ovXf5l2eHT3vo+wp+h7CKaPf xxOE1fvk4Eb88yR2L3muaeAuEkBqyiNom/hMwGxYnteWadINjnCqJiujfHBNHyVAXjwOlR OPL122SBcxtLE6ubp5GOrb7jXe6xsftJvy+zghfBcfGV4yIxjLxmPebgoj+llYFOcnNtmT 4MOUDezMKcxl9wKfMKo/Tbls3ltBQ4J22T9AIGTceljZ69JvFaVZp6gP8krNRpFVtTLFm5 AQuwx9Ghoqr7BfpK9ShMdRqRH9E6A5JNmo4VQvfSJRZSuCOQkdawpR4yZa0zgQ== Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 11:52:50 +0200 From: Maxime Chevallier To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, Andrew Lunn , Jakub Kicinski , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy , Herve Codina , Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , Vladimir Oltean , Marek =?UTF-8?B?QmVow7pu?= , =?UTF-8?B?S8O2cnk=?= Maincent Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/9] net: phy: Allow PHY drivers to report isolation support Message-ID: <20241007115250.5c9e2f3e@device-21.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20241004161601.2932901-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> <20241004161601.2932901-4-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-GND-Sasl: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241007_025255_468829_DF69BB0C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.30 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 18:46:20 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 06:15:53PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote: > > Some PHYs have malfunctionning isolation modes, where the MII lines > > aren't correctly set in high-impedance, potentially interfering with the > > MII bus in unexpected ways. Some other PHYs simply don't support it. > > Do we have in this case multiple isolation variants like high-impedance > and "the other one"? :) Do the "the other one" is still usable for some > cases like Wake on LAN without shared xMII? I don't think there are multiple variants, at least I didn't see any :/ Maxime